B A or C would be acceptable were they to happen but I think they will not in a reasonable timescale (and as an engineer, I want something that I can use:-)
In passing, I am one of the third, not the two thirds, and do accept that we have rough consensus. Tom Petch -----Original Message----- From: Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 04 August 2003 19:14 Subject: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing >[IPv6 working group chair hat on] > >B) Deprecate Site-Local addresses at the same time as a alternative >solution is agreed to. This would mean advancing both documents at the >same time and making them include normative references to each other to >insure that they were published at the same time. This would result in the >deprecation only happening if a consensus was reached on an alternative. > >Thanks, >Bob > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
