On 11 Mar 2016, at 6:07, Daniel Migault wrote:
> I would also be more than happy to present our ongoing work on IKEv2/YANG.
Great! Please so do on the list. :-)
--Paul Hoffman
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
On 11 Mar 2016, at 4:55, Paul Wouters wrote:
I would like to discuss the IKEv2 IANA registries and the requirements
for new code points. This is in response to Tero's comments regarding
the latest non-WG entry for a 3gpp extension that was never passed
through the working group. Tero's
On 10 Mar 2016, at 23:13, Yoav Nir wrote:
Regarding draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves
I think this is pretty much done. I don’t see why I’d need 15
minutes to say, “Version -00 had Curve25519; version -01 added
Curve448; we don’t need to wait for CFRG’s signature draft,
because we have RFC
On 10 Mar 2016, at 21:52, Valery Smyslov wrote:
I'd like to make a short presentation (~10 min) about using
compression in IKEv2
(draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compression).
Sorry, we totally spaced that out. We'll add it.
I'm also a bit puzzled that there is nothing in the agenda
concerning
Hi everyone,
I would also be more than happy to present our ongoing work on IKEv2/YANG.
BR
Daniel
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>
>> https: //www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme
>>
>>
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote:
https: //www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme
Comments are welcome.
Of course, this is not an invitation to stop conversation before the meeting;
just the opposite. Please keep the on-list discussion active so that the
meeting can be
Regarding draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves
I think this is pretty much done. I don’t see why I’d need 15 minutes to say,
“Version -00 had Curve25519; version -01 added Curve448; we don’t need to wait
for CFRG’s signature draft, because we have RFC 7427; I think we’re ready for
WGLC”
Yoav
> On
Hi Paul,
I'd like to make a short presentation (~10 min) about using compression in IKEv2
(draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compression).
I'm also a bit puzzled that there is nothing in the agenda
concerning the yang data model for IPsec. I remember in Prague
authors promised to merge their drafts
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme
Comments are welcome.
Of course, this is not an invitation to stop conversation before the
meeting; just the opposite. Please keep the on-list discussion active so
that the meeting can be more useful.
--Dave Waltermire and Paul