Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 11 Mar 2016, at 6:07, Daniel Migault wrote: > I would also be more than happy to present our ongoing work on IKEv2/YANG. Great! Please so do on the list. :-) --Paul Hoffman ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 11 Mar 2016, at 4:55, Paul Wouters wrote: I would like to discuss the IKEv2 IANA registries and the requirements for new code points. This is in response to Tero's comments regarding the latest non-WG entry for a 3gpp extension that was never passed through the working group. Tero's

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 10 Mar 2016, at 23:13, Yoav Nir wrote: Regarding draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves I think this is pretty much done. I don’t see why I’d need 15 minutes to say, “Version -00 had Curve25519; version -01 added Curve448; we don’t need to wait for CFRG’s signature draft, because we have RFC

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 10 Mar 2016, at 21:52, Valery Smyslov wrote: I'd like to make a short presentation (~10 min) about using compression in IKEv2 (draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compression). Sorry, we totally spaced that out. We'll add it. I'm also a bit puzzled that there is nothing in the agenda concerning

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi everyone, I would also be more than happy to present our ongoing work on IKEv2/YANG. BR Daniel On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > >> https: //www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme >> >>

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-11 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote: https: //www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme Comments are welcome. Of course, this is not an invitation to stop conversation before the meeting; just the opposite. Please keep the on-list discussion active so that the meeting can be

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-10 Thread Yoav Nir
Regarding draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves I think this is pretty much done. I don’t see why I’d need 15 minutes to say, “Version -00 had Curve25519; version -01 added Curve448; we don’t need to wait for CFRG’s signature draft, because we have RFC 7427; I think we’re ready for WGLC” Yoav > On

Re: [IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-10 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Paul, I'd like to make a short presentation (~10 min) about using compression in IKEv2 (draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-compression). I'm also a bit puzzled that there is nothing in the agenda concerning the yang data model for IPsec. I remember in Prague authors promised to merge their drafts

[IPsec] Proposed agenda for the upcoming meeting in Buenos Aires

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Hoffman
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-ipsecme Comments are welcome. Of course, this is not an invitation to stop conversation before the meeting; just the opposite. Please keep the on-list discussion active so that the meeting can be more useful. --Dave Waltermire and Paul