A small clarification required

2004-04-13 Thread Jayabharathi
In RFC 3316, "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) for Some Second and Third Generation Cellular Hosts" why there are no transition mechanisms listed. Is there any assumption behind this, that always there will be a default router in the network (thatone of the transition mechanisms) to

RE: A small clarification required

2004-04-13 Thread Soliman Hesham
RFC 3316 intentionally doesn't address transition issues. These issues are addressed in the 3GPP scenarios and analysis drafts in v6ops. Hesham -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of JayabharathiSent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:08

Re :[rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread PARK SOO HONG
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle I second 1+X.AFAIC, from the beginning, this draft explicitly considered DHCPv6 (though it was not RFC)as a stateful mechanism.Stateful autoconfiguration is described in [DHCPv6].wrote in RFC1971, Aug. 1996. Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Platform

Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:53:07 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Regarding issue 277 of rfc2462bis (Semantics of M/O flags), one controversial issue is how clearly we should specify the stateful address configuration protocol. (forgot to mention this) in this message, I

Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread S. Daniel Park
I second 1+X. AFAIC, from the beginning, this draft explicitly considered DHCPv6 (though it was not RFC) as a stateful mechanism. Stateful autoconfiguration is described in [DHCPv6]. wrote in RFC1971, Aug. 1996. - Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) - Mobile Platform Laboratory, Samsung Electronics.

RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery

2004-04-13 Thread Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
Hi, For IPv6, Should we run Neighbor Discovery protocol over PPP links? Thanks Subu IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread Alain Durand
JINMEI Tatuya / wrote: Question A: how should rfc2462bis specify the stateful protocol? possible answers: 1. clearly say that stateful address configuration is DHCPv6 2. (intentionally) do not say anything about this, and (implicitly or explicitly) leave it to the node requirements

Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread Kurt Erik Lindqvist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-04-13, at 15.53, JINMEI Tatuya / wrote: Is there any other reason for not being clear on this (i.e., not clearly say the stateful protocol is DHCPv6)? Or is this just a matter of preference? I would prefer 2+Y. Simply to minimize

RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread john . loughney
Hi all, Question A: how should rfc2462bis specify the stateful protocol? possible answers: 1. clearly say that stateful address configuration is DHCPv6 2. (intentionally) do not say anything about this, and (implicitly or explicitly) leave it to the node requirements document

RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol

2004-04-13 Thread Bernie Volz
I'm for (1) DHCPv6 and a reference to RFC 3315 (X). - Bernie Volz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the