>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:53:07 +0900, >>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Regarding issue 277 of rfc2462bis (Semantics of M/O flags), one > controversial issue is how clearly we should specify the stateful > address configuration protocol. (forgot to mention this) in this message, I intentionally concentrated on the stateful *address* configuration protocol. We'll also need a similar discussion about the stateful protocol for *other* configurations. However, things are much clearer for address configuration and it would help to limit the discussion scope for not making it unncessarily diverse. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------