Re: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft

2005-04-11 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Mukesh, On Apr 11, 2005, at 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fernando, I agree that we should add some words to raise awareness about the ICMP-based attacks. We could add the text that Pekka suggested in the security consideration section and provide an informative reference to your draft. Sound

RE: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft

2005-04-11 Thread Mukesh . K . Gupta
Fernando, I agree that we should add some words to raise awareness about the ICMP-based attacks. We could add the text that Pekka suggested in the security consideration section and provide an informative reference to your draft. I don't think the ICMP draft should go in details of how a transpo

Re: Anycast support in draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-02.txt

2005-04-11 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Erik, On Apr 8, 2005, at 19:41, Erik Nordmark wrote: Brian Haberman wrote: o An anycast address MAY be used as the source address of an IPv6 packet. o An anycast address MAY be assigned to an IPv6 host. This change will allow users to operate IPv6 anycast services in the same man

Re: Anycast support in draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-02.txt

2005-04-11 Thread Rob Austein
At Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:10:57 -0700, Erik Nordmark wrote: > > Sounds like my suggestion above needs to be clarified in that it doesn't > prohibit fragmentation. Yep. Probably best just to say that we don't know how to do Path MTU discovery with anycast source address and point to the text in oth