I've never read RFC 3005, but my take is that in this specific
advertisement is very meaningful for both IPv6 and V6ops mailing lists,
so I wouldn't see where there would be a problem this time.
But on a general basis, I've seen too many postings which were really
not appropriate to be sent on to
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:50:38 -0500,
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> This is more than strictly required for interoperability.
> I think that's the key point. It's very important to make sure that
> the things marked as "MUST" or "MUST NOT" are actually requirements
> for i
