[RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Yukiyo Akisada
Hi, all. I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends redirect packet to the host. Can the host considers that the default

Privacy IPv6 addresses (RFC 4941) and the SNMP IP address table in RFC 4293

2008-06-24 Thread Kristine Adamson
Hello, I have a question about the SNMP IP address table in RFC 4293. For privacy IPv6 addresses (as described in RFC 3041), it appears that the ipAddressOrigin MIB object is supposed to be set to a value of random(6). Is this true also for these addresses as defined by RFC 4941, where

Re: [RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:06 +0900, Yukiyo Akisada wrote: I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends redirect packet to the

Re: [RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Sebastien Roy wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:06 +0900, Yukiyo Akisada wrote: I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends

FW: Neighbor Discovery and on-link determination

2008-06-24 Thread MILES DAVID
This issue was raised in v6ops, that on comments from Thomas seem better suited for v6man. Copied here to continue discussion. From: David Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 25 June 2008 10:04:25 AM To: Thomas Narten [EMAIL PROTECTED], IETF V6OPS WG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Neighbor