Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 03:18:43AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Surely we can never hope to eliminate the need for converting to a > a canonical form before comparing. The canonical form for machine > comparisons is fairly obvious - a 128 bit binary number. The question > seems to be whether

RE: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Dan Wing
> -Original Message- > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pek...@netcore.fi] > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:31 PM > To: Juergen Schoenwaelder > Cc: Dan Wing; > draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representat...@tools.ietf.org; > 'IETF IPv6 Mailing List' > Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6m

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: 1) Mandate that the text representation is and never changes after this. 2) Mandate that the text representation is but take into account new WKPs. 3) Mandate that the text representation is but require that external mechanis

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2010-01-07 13:21, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 05:35:21PM +0100, Dan Wing wrote: > >>> My main interest is textual comparability of addresses coming from >>> potentially many different sources. If I can compare addresses safely >>> only if I know some context informati

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Seiichi Kawamura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I guess it comes down to either (2) or (3), but I'm slightly uncomfortable with the word "require" in (3). What I personally like, is the text representation is , take into account new WKPs. Also suggest that tools might help if they had the option t

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 05:35:21PM +0100, Dan Wing wrote: > > My main interest is textual comparability of addresses coming from > > potentially many different sources. If I can compare addresses safely > > only if I know some context information communicated out of band or I > > have to configure

RE: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Dan Wing
> > Regarding your #4, I do not believe we are ready to specify > a mandatory > way > > to > > learn a network translator's prefix. And I say that as author of > > draft-wing-behave-learn-prefix (which proposes using DHCPv6 > and DNS) and > my > > awareness of draft-bcx-behave-learn-address (whi

RE: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation

2010-01-06 Thread Dan Wing
> -Original Message- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder > [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:08 PM > To: Dan Wing > Cc: 'Jari Arkko'; > draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representat...@tools.ietf.org; > 'IETF IPv6 Mailing List' > Subject: Re: AD rev