The agenda has been uploaded and can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/6man.html
Thanks,
Bob & Brian
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailma
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:25:54 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > >However, it would seem that several of the major vendors (e.g. Cisco,
> > >Juniper) have interpreted this differently, and chosen not to perform
> > >ND on point-to-point links.
> >
> > Do you mean perform, as in issue the NS
> >However, it would seem that several of the major vendors (e.g. Cisco,
> >Juniper) have interpreted this differently, and chosen not to perform
> >ND on point-to-point links.
>
> Do you mean perform, as in issue the NS request or also in not responding
> to a NS request from the peer?
I have no
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:16:24 +0200 (CEST)
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > For point-to-point links, which can do multicast trivially, there is no
> > excuse
> > for not doing full ND (unless it is a link between two routers that actually
> > use hellos in the routing protocol to determine whether th
In your letter dated Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:16:24 +0200 (CEST) you wrote:
>> For point-to-point links, which can do multicast trivially, there is no excu
>se
>> for not doing full ND (unless it is a link between two routers that actually
>> use hellos in the routing protocol to determine whether the o
> For point-to-point links, which can do multicast trivially, there is no excuse
> for not doing full ND (unless it is a link between two routers that actually
> use hellos in the routing protocol to determine whether the other side is
> alive).
However, it would seem that several of the major ven
In your letter dated Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:26:47 +0930 you wrote:
>I'm a bit confused by that. My understanding of NUD was that it's main
>function is to ensure that existing entries in the neighbor cache are
>valid. If NUD fails, then the entry is removed from the neighbor cache
>so that next time t
In your letter dated Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:26:47 +0930 you wrote:
>(Is something up with the 6man mailing list? I've had a few replies,
>including one from Philip, none of them have CC'd ipv6@ietf.org, nor
>have I seen any replies via the list, and yet below seems show that a
>copy of Philip's email
Hi Dave,
(Is something up with the 6man mailing list? I've had a few replies,
including one from Philip, none of them have CC'd ipv6@ietf.org, nor
have I seen any replies via the list, and yet below seems show that a
copy of Philip's email made it through. I have received a 3 I-D action
emails via
