On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Ole Troan wrote:
I don't understand what you mean when you say ND isn't needed.
basic ND has this set of functions:
Router Discovery
Prefix Discovery
Parameter Discovery
Address Autoconfiguration
Address resolution
Next-hop determination
Neighbor Unreac
Mikael,
[changing subject as this has departed from discussing the RS mark draft]
>> I think the technical issue there is that ND and RA were designed as a
>> package, and you certainly can't run without ND.
>
> Well, the DHCPv6 standard can be changed to hand out information so ND isn't
> need
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I think the technical issue there is that ND and RA were designed as a
package, and you certainly can't run without ND.
Well, the DHCPv6 standard can be changed to hand out information so ND
isn't needed. This is what I had in mind. This would rem
On 2010-09-20 17:31, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Thanks for that. Now, what is needed for those techniques to be
>> fully deployable for IPv6, except work by the vendor(s)? Is there
>> any work needed on the basic IPv6 standards?
>
> Well, I thin
