Mikael,
[changing subject as this has departed from discussing the RS mark draft]
>> I think the technical issue there is that ND and RA were designed as a
>> package, and you certainly can't run without ND.
>
> Well, the DHCPv6 standard can be changed to hand out information so ND isn't
> needed. This is what I had in mind. This would remove the need for the whole
> RA/ND/RS package completely.
I don't understand what you mean when you say ND isn't needed.
basic ND has this set of functions:
Router Discovery
Prefix Discovery
Parameter Discovery
Address Autoconfiguration
Address resolution
Next-hop determination
Neighbor Unreachability Detection
Duplicate Address Detection
Redirect
are you proposing that DHCPv6 is extended to cover all of them?
if not, then which ones?
cheers,
Ole
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
