On Oct 2, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
>> SEND implementation?
>>
>> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
>> given away for free?
>
> you really need to ask your lawyer.
>
> t
On Oct 2, 2010, at 13:10, Fernando Gont wrote:
> FWIW, not only I do not have a ipr-illustrated lawyer, but I'm not
> willing to pay for a lawyer to illustrate me about something I'm not
> planning to implement or ship myself, either.
Fernando,
current patent law has many interesting properties
On 02/10/2010 05:57 a.m., Randy Bush wrote:
>> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
>> SEND implementation?
>>
>> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
>> given away for free?
>
> you really need to ask your lawyer.
I thought
> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
> SEND implementation?
>
> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
> given away for free?
you really need to ask your lawyer.
though i am sure you will get plenty of advice here. if not,
On 01/10/2010 10:10 p.m., Bob Hinden wrote:
>> It has been pointed out to me of the IPRs on SEND/CGAs, which I
>> checked at:
[]
>> Can anybody confirm that it is required to get a license from MS
>> to implement this?
>
> I can't speak to that directly and I am not a lawyer, but it's my
> un
