* Florian Weimer
And I see no functional difference between the gateway and the host
generating the fragment ID, except that the latter approach seems to
require network-wide software updates currently.
A stateless translator does not keep track of the PMTU for the IPv4
destinations. That
* Tore Anderson:
* Florian Weimer
And I see no functional difference between the gateway and the host
generating the fragment ID, except that the latter approach seems to
require network-wide software updates currently.
A stateless translator does not keep track of the PMTU for the IPv4
* Florian Weimer
* Tore Anderson:
* Florian Weimer
And I see no functional difference between the gateway and the host
generating the fragment ID, except that the latter approach seems to
require network-wide software updates currently.
A stateless translator does not keep track of the
* Brian Haberman
This is a consensus call on adopting:
Title : Processing of IPv6 atomic fragments
Author(s) : Fernando Gont
Filename : draft-gont-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-00.txt
Pages : 12
Date : 2011-12-15
as a 6MAN working group
In your letter dated Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:18:21 +0100 you wrote:
Because the network ends up second-guessing the host. RFC 2460 allows
IPv6 nodes to act on ICMPv6 PTBs w/MTU 1280 by simply lowering the
Path MTU for the destination to the indicated value. In other words, an
IPv6 node can perform
In your letter dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:41:18 -0300 you wrote:
That said, nobody is *introducing* atomic fragments.They should have
been supported for more than 15 years, and there is other stuff
(mentioned by Dan Wing at others) that would break without this.
Currently, atomic fragments are
On 01/30/2012 06:28 PM, Philip Homburg wrote:
In your letter dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:41:18 -0300 you wrote:
That said, nobody is *introducing* atomic fragments.They should have
been supported for more than 15 years, and there is other stuff
(mentioned by Dan Wing at others) that would break
* Philip Homburg
In your letter dated Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:18:21 +0100 you wrote:
Because the network ends up second-guessing the host. RFC 2460 allows
IPv6 nodes to act on ICMPv6 PTBs w/MTU 1280 by simply lowering the
Path MTU for the destination to the indicated value. In other words, an
