On 01/30/2012 06:28 PM, Philip Homburg wrote: > In your letter dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:41:18 -0300 you wrote: >> That said, nobody is *introducing* atomic fragments.They should have >> been supported for more than 15 years, and there is other stuff >> (mentioned by Dan Wing at others) that would break without this. > > Currently, atomic fragments are rare. > [...] > > I'm not seeing that on todays IPv6 network. So that would be completely > new.
See this: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42572 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42595 And this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ipv6/22728 And there are others... Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
