Hi, Brian
There comes comments finally :-) Thanks for your concern about the draft.
I've noticed the discussion in 6man and homenet, which is more in-depth
technical issue while the ULA usage draft is more general use cases. But I
think it is exactly valuable input and consideration to the
We are still in need of people to take minutes and act as Jabber
scribes. I am working on getting etherpad setup for the 6man session so
that minute taking can be a collaborative effort between multiple people.
Regards,
Brian
On 3/15/12 7:32 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
The preliminary
Andres,
Thanks for writing up this use-case. Quick Q - What global ID would get
used in the ULA (assuming GUA is not known yet)?
In a homenet case, why cannot the default ULA policy be boiled down to
Discard
ULA packets trying to pass the CER?
That would be reasonable. Perhaps, just deny
On Mar 22, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Anders Brandt wrote:
As a branch of the discussion [homenet] ULA scope
[draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt],
I would like some clear explanation of the actual issues related to routing
between hosts in ULA subnets.
Some people seems to be concerned for a
