All,
I have posted a draft agenda at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/agenda/agenda-85-6man
If something has been missed, please let the chairs know.
As we are meeting first thing Monday morning, please let the chairs have the
slides as soon as possible, no later than Saturday the 3rd
Hello 6man chairs,
If it fits within available space, I would like to request a short slot
to present Prefix Delegation extensions to ND :
Prefix Delegation extension to Neighbor Discovery protocol
draft-kaiser-nd-pd-00
Speaker: Alexandru Petrescu, alexandru.petre...@cea.fr
5min(?)
For
ralph Why wouldn't RPL be used for such networks? It has built-in PD for
ralph dynamic networks, if I understand it correctly, with RA used at the
ralph subnet level.
Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
AP RA used to exchange routes - if this is what you mean,
Le 24/10/2012 19:04, STARK, BARBARA H a écrit :
If an LV never ever wanted to get a PD from anything other than an
IV, and an IV could only ever expect to delegate to a LV, then I see
no problem.
I understand in that case there would be no problem use ND instead of
DHCP to realize PD.
On the
Le 25/10/2012 13:14, Michael Richardson a écrit :
Ralph Droms rdroms.i...@gmail.com wrote:
But with vehicles, one connects a vehicle here and gets a
prefix, then moves in that area and gets another prefix. At
that point, if the router obtaining a prefix wants to delegate
further to another
On 25/10/2012 17:03, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Hello Brian,
Thank you for the email. Please see below some comments.
Le 23/10/2012 14:19, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
I realised while reading this draft that I just don't understand
its operating model. It refers to the requesting router
