On Nov 3, 2012, at 19:25 , Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 03/11/2012 18:54, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
Hello Alex,
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:41 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 25/10/2012 15:52, Michael Richardson a écrit :
ralph Why
On Nov 3, 2012, at 19:29 , Alexandru Petrescu alexandru.petre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 03/11/2012 19:05, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
Hello Alex,
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:53 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/11/2012 20:59, Michael Richardson a écrit :
Alexandru
Le 05/11/2012 11:01, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
On Nov 3, 2012, at 19:25 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 03/11/2012 18:54, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
Hello Alex,
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:41 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 25/10/2012 15:52,
Le 05/11/2012 11:12, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
On Nov 3, 2012, at 19:29 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 03/11/2012 19:05, Romain KUNTZ a écrit :
Hello Alex,
On Nov 3, 2012, at 17:53 , Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/11/2012 20:59, Michael
As I understand draft-carpenter-ext-transmit, the goal is to make sure
that at least firewalls support the list of extension headers we have
now. Not all of them were defined in 2460, and so they aren't all
supported.
This document basically says we are done defining extension headers, we
have
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Security and Interoperability Implications of
Oversized IPv6 Header Chains
Author(s) : Fernando
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6
Neighbor Discovery
Author(s) : Fernando
6man Chairs,
Here is an update the chairs can give to the 6man meeting at the Atlanta IETF.
I and Wes Beebee resolved all issues with Ray Hunter except one. The receive
section of the algorithm has been tweaked to satisfy Ray Hunter. Then one
pending issue caused the document to not be
Hi,
I forgot to ask for a 5 min slot for this in Atlanta.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chown-6man-tokenised-ipv6-identifiers-02
The draft describes a way to simplify (a little!) server renumbering in SLAAC
networks. Rather than manually configuring a 128-bit address on servers, you
Tim,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to ask for a 5 min slot for this in Atlanta.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chown-6man-tokenised-ipv6-identifiers-02
I think this is a good idea. Some comments on the draft.
I think the draft is recommending that all
Tim
I have mixing feelings about. I like the option, but I am not sure if I
would deploy it for my production services, perhaps only for training
labs and some other no critical infrastructure. Definitely I would not
want a rogue RA injecting the wrong prefix for my servers.
HEllo Behcet,
I pick on this email to reply.
You presented today draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01 in 6man.
There are these other two drafts which do practically the same thing:
route exchange using ND.
draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp-00.txt
draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-02.txt
These
On 05/11/2012 14:56, Michael Richardson wrote:
As I understand draft-carpenter-ext-transmit, the goal is to make sure
that at least firewalls support the list of extension headers we have
now. Not all of them were defined in 2460, and so they aren't all
supported.
This document basically
Hi Dave, Lorenzo, all,
Thanks for the comments during 6man session this morning.
Can you please send your comments, possibly replying to this mail?
Regards,
Behcet
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Hi Dave, all,
Thanks for the comments during 6man session this morning.
Can you please send your comments, possibly replying to this mail?
Regards,
Behcet
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative
Hi, Tim,
On 11/05/2012 11:18 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
Is there interest in promoting this idea further, and importantly any
IPR preventing doing so? Or is there reluctance from admins to rely on
RAs to configure a full server IPv6 address?
I've gone through the I-D, and found it valuable. Here
On 05/11/2012 21:56, Fernando Gont wrote:
Hi, Tim,
On 11/05/2012 11:18 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
Is there interest in promoting this idea further, and importantly any
IPR preventing doing so? Or is there reluctance from admins to rely on
RAs to configure a full server IPv6 address?
I've gone
17 matches
Mail list logo
