Dear Med and Stig,
I technically support this draft.
The newly defined flgs field has the same field name in old Addressing
Architecture. I would suggest renaming newly defined flgs field.
Thank you,
Tina
> -Original Message-
> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org]
Folks,
Is the I-D ready to ship?
It has been weeks since I posted the last rev. My understanding is that
this I-D is ready to ship (after the clarifications I made on-list, and
the tweaks I made to the I-D). But if there's any remaining bit, I'd
like to know. But if the RTTs for these exchanges g
Understood. No objection from here.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/17/2013 5:27 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
On 2012-12-12 09:44, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Thanks for the Review,
On 2012-12-12 02:02, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
This (and the companion document draft-ietf-6man-udpzero) seem ready for
publication
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 and UDP Checksums for Tunneled Packets
Author(s) : Marshall Eubanks
On 2012-12-12 09:44, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Thanks for the Review,
>
> On 2012-12-12 02:02, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> This (and the companion document draft-ietf-6man-udpzero) seem ready for
>> publication to me.
>>
>> I do have a minor questions. It is sufficiently minor that if necessary
>>
