Hi,
I've had a very brief look, because there was one specific thing I was looking
for, and it doesn't seem to be there.
Addresses/IIDs have to last at least as long as the transport layer/application
connections are using them, unless the transport layer/application connection
takes ownership
>
> > The aim of this draft is to adapt the current RFC to the latest
> > European law
> > http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en
>
> Can you please identify the exact clause in the proposed EU regulation that
> would require pseudo-random IIDs that change when the subnet
> The aim of this draft is to adapt the current RFC to the latest European law
> http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en
Can you please identify the exact clause in the proposed EU regulation
that would require pseudo-random IIDs that change when the subnet
prefix changes?
Has anybody had a chance to look at this draft
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-6man-ra-privacy )? Any comments?
The aim of this draft is to adapt the current RFC to the latest European law
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en and to
accommodate the needs of custom
> In other emails
>"you said X", when I never said such a thing.
First, I did not talk on behalf of you. Probably there is misunderstanding in
the meaning of the following sentence in my last email (not emails).
>Since Fernando’s proposal is not going to solve the current problem with RFC
>494
