Hi,

I've had a very brief look, because there was one specific thing I was looking 
for, and it doesn't seem to be there.

Addresses/IIDs have to last at least as long as the transport layer/application 
connections are using them, unless the transport layer/application connection 
takes ownership of dealing with addresses that might "change underneath them". 
In general, larger preferred and valid lifetimes (e.g, measured in hours or 
greater) and fairly stable identifiers are intended to avoid transport layer 
protocols/applications having to deal with them changing.

Rather than trying to shorten the lifetimes and lowering the stability of 
addresses to the point where they may disrupt the applications using them, 
perhaps creating per-application or transport layer connection addresses may be 
a better idea, as discussed in:

"Transient Addressing for Related Processes: Improved Firewalling by Using IPV6 
and Multiple Addresses per Host"
https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/tarp.pdf



Regards,
Mark. 



----- Original Message -----
> From: Hosnieh Rafiee <i...@rozanak.com>
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Sunday, 5 May 2013 5:17 AM
> Subject: solution to RFC 4941 I-D action : draft-rafiee-6man-ra-privacy.txt - 
> 
> Has anybody had a chance to look at this draft
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-6man-ra-privacy )? Any comments?
> The aim of this draft is to adapt the current RFC to the latest European law
> http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-46_en.htm?locale=en and to
> accommodate the needs of customers with relation to the new law for a long
> term period. The purpose is to allow users to choose their means to the
> privacy and anonymity within a network as well as across networks. 
> 
> There is still an option of merging this draft with other drafts, that
> address the issue of allowing users to set the lifetime of the IP address
> during the installation or an option to set it by the users, if people on
> the mailing list thinks it would be useful. 
> Share your technical ideas.
> 
> Thanks,
> Best,
> Hosnieh
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to