Re: Benchmarking RFC 5180 IPv6 allocation

2013-08-23 Thread Freek Dijkstra
On 23-08-2013 15:23, Freek Dijkstra wrote: > What's the Benchmarking IPv6 allocation made by RFC 5180? > > The RFC and IANA registry seem to mismatch. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5180#section-8 lists: > >> The IANA has allocated 2001:0200::/48 for IPv6 benchmarking, which is >>a 48-bi

Benchmarking RFC 5180 IPv6 allocation

2013-08-23 Thread Freek Dijkstra
What's the Benchmarking IPv6 allocation made by RFC 5180? The RFC and IANA registry seem to mismatch. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5180#section-8 lists: > The IANA has allocated 2001:0200::/48 for IPv6 benchmarking, which is >a 48-bit prefix from the RFC 4773 pool. http://www.iana.org/assi

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2013-08-23 Thread Mark ZZZ Smith
Hi Tim, - Original Message - > From: Tim Chown > To: Fernando Gont > Cc: Mark ZZZ Smith ; "6man-cha...@tools.ietf.org > Chairs" <6man-cha...@tools.ietf.org>; 6man WG > Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 8:56 PM > Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: > > On 22 Aug 2013, at 22:58, Fernando Gont

RE: draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-02 submitted

2013-08-23 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Hello Mark: There is a need for a protocol between the 6LBRs/NEAR routers to exchange their state. This could be achieved by an extension on ND for proxy operations as described in dratf-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router, a similar extension to a routing protocol running on the backbone or a rich

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2013-08-23 Thread Tim Chown
On 22 Aug 2013, at 22:58, Fernando Gont wrote: > On 08/19/2013 08:19 AM, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote: >> >> Going by the title, it seems my comment was missed about not implying >> that this address generation technique is limited to SLAAC slack >> scenarios, but could be useful with any address config

Re: 6MAN WG Last Call:

2013-08-23 Thread Ole Troan
all, short and sweet document; a few comments if I may. - this new behaviour is supposed to be implemented by all hosts, right? shouldn't this document then update rfc4861? - "AP" isn't defined section 1. - section 1 bullet b. couldn't you argue that turning off periodic RAs is a configuration

6MAN Adoption call on

2013-08-23 Thread Ole Troan
All, This message starts a one week 6MAN Working Group call on adopting: Title : Security Implications of IPv6 Options of Type 10xx Author(s): F. Gont, W. Liu Filename: draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-03 Pages: 12 Date

6MAN WG Last Call:

2013-08-23 Thread Ole Troan
All, This message starts the second two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing: Title : Packet loss resiliency for Router Solicitations Author(s): S. Krishnan, D. Anipko, D. Thaler Filename: draft-ietf-6man-resilient-rs-01 Pages: 6 D