On Jun 6, 2013 8:58 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
While my statements in this forum are my opinion alone and not intended
to represent ARIN or the AC, I think I bring a pretty good knowledge of
both the letter and the intent of the policies as they exist today.
Thus, it should be easy
Hi all,
I would like to officially ask that our draft is accepted as a WG
item. If it's accepted, we get out of the stale-mate and if it's
rejected, I can stop wasting time on it :)
Afaik, this will be decided upon at the next IETF conference?
Thanks,
Richard
[1]
Hi all,
after renaming to draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming, I am still
waiting for feedback.
I am not sure how the exact procedures are: Does lack of feedback mean
people are mostly OK with this or that no one cares? Am I too
impatient? Should I be doing something I am not doing yet?
If
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:17, Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net wrote:
I happen to agree. I don't see the point. After all, what are the
numbers between the dots in IPv4 addresses called?
Octects.
Richard
IETF IPv6 working
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:05, Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
OK. I've read it and find many of the arguments to be generally
unconvincing. Right with you on chazwazza though :-)
That's fine. This is why we are here :)
If the draft is to document what amounts to a popularity contest
forward to any and all feedback,
this issue might not seem to be important at first, but many/most
people tend to reconsider after some thinking,
thanks,
Richard Hartmann
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 23:52, Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-00
The main work is shared between two editors listed alphabetically so I
am unsure how to name this fairly. Suggestions?
draft-donnerhackehartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-00 is a tad too
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 03:54, Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
hextet - oh dear. Were there really no better suggestions than quibble
and hextet?
If you look at -02 of the initial draft, you will find a full list.
Googling for the name of the ID will bring up a lot of discussions on
