Replying based on my understanding
-Original Message-
From: Eliot Lear [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
Sent: 05 March 2010 08:02
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option
Woj,
Three questions for the group:
1. Is there a practical
Fine by me. Can the chairs allow 10mins for this draft?
-Woj.
From: teemu.savolai...@nokia.com
[mailto:teemu.savolai...@nokia.com]
Sent: 09 March 2010 09:04
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec); ipv6@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org
Subject: RE
Hi Folks,
About 1 year ago we put together draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option), which after
having been presented and initially discussed in the DHC WG, was deemed
by the ADs (Ralph and Jari) to require 6man discussion before going any
further.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker (fred)
Sent: 14 January 2010 00:37
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Cc: Ole Troan; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Question: Detecting routers on a link
stepping away from ULAs, I should think the point is to
propagate routing configuration information
Perhaps a basic question or two: What is the purpose of the ULA being
advertised on the shared segment, and is the intent for the 2nd router
to auto-config itself an address in the ULA space and begin advertising
that ULA too?
Also, what is the proposed way of dealing with the case where the 2nd
-Original Message-
From: Ole Troan [mailto:ichiroumak...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Ole Troan
Sent: 13 January 2010 11:37
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Question: Detecting routers on a link
Woj et al,
Perhaps a basic question or two: What
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Rémi Després
Sent: 09 December 2009 11:06
To: Xu Xiaohu
Cc: x...@cernet.edu.cn; eric.bur...@orange-ftgroup.com;
beh...@ietf.org; 'Brian E Carpenter'; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE]
I'd like to put forward some additional points which should perhaps be
concise enough to clarify the liaison and questions a bit more.
There are actually two issues, out of which the duplicate MAC address
issue is IMO a far less tractable problem (as it needs to be solved at
L2 for anything to
Based on a recent thread
(http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2008/msg00896.html) the
following paragraph from the draft appears to warrant some more thought
if not outright a revision
In addition to the Prefix List, individual addresses are on-link if
they are the target of a
if not downright
additional security issues for operators.
-Woj.
-Original Message-
From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: 26 June 2008 16:29
To: Wojciech Dec (wdec); Brian Haberman; ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: MILES DAVID; Bob Hinden
Subject: RE: 6MAN WG Last
Call:draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model
10 matches
Mail list logo
