Re: [RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-25 Thread Yukiyo Akisada
Hi, Sebastien and Vlad. Thanks for your inputs. Well, I will get in flexibility of ND. But having said that, my concern was also that the Redirect is the same layer in ND, as Vlad said. Regards, On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:57:57 -0400 Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sebastien Roy wrote:

[RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Yukiyo Akisada
Hi, all. I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends redirect packet to the host. Can the host considers that the default

Re: [RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:06 +0900, Yukiyo Akisada wrote: I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends redirect packet to the

Re: [RFC 4861] upper-layer reachability confirmation

2008-06-24 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Sebastien Roy wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:06 +0900, Yukiyo Akisada wrote: I have a question about upper-layer reachability confirmation defined in RFC 4861. When the neighbor cache state for the default router is STALE and the host sends a packet to off-link, the default router sends