Hi, Bob,
Please replace the link to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-00
with a link to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-02
Thanks!
Cheers,
Fernando
On 03/04/2013 09:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
You can find the current 6MAN agenda
On 03/08/2013 12:06 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
Hi, Bob,
Please replace the link to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-00
with a link to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-02
It's better to leave the -NN off the end altogether, then the
Hosnieh == Hosnieh Rafiee i...@rozanak.com writes:
Hosnieh This is not true. I think that you have confused this
Hosnieh draft with another draft that was not about security but
Hosnieh had the title Stable Privacy Addresses. Otherwise you are
Hosnieh saying that you do not want
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 6:31 PM
To: Hosnieh Rafiee
Cc: Karl Auer; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Hosnieh == Hosnieh Rafiee i...@rozanak.com writes:
Hosnieh This is not true. I think that you have confused this
Hosnieh draft with another draft
Bob
DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt
I think this is a very important topic. Its impact might seem to fall
more in v6ops territory, and it also has relevance to mif and homenet,
but only 6man (IMHO) can fix
Agenda for IETF86
You can find the current 6MAN agenda at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man
We prioritized drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been
actively discussed on the list.
As you will note in the agenda, there is a if time allowed section
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 16:02 -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration
draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt
[...]
DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt
Bob,
The agenda shows an obsolete version for draft-carpenter-6man-ext-transmit-02.
The changes are significant!
Regards
Brian
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests:
Brian,
The agenda shows an obsolete version for draft-carpenter-6man-ext-transmit-02.
The changes are significant!
thanks, fixed.
cheers,
Ole
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests:
mins
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/maillist.html
Thank you,
Hosnieh
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob
Hinden
Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 01:03
To: IPv6 List
Cc: Bob Hinden
Subject: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hosnieh Rafiee
Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 12:26
To: 'Bob Hinden'; 'Ole Troan'
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Dear All,
I would appreciate if you explain your criteria
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 16:02 -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration
draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt
[...]
DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
draft-liu-bonica
, March 5, 2013 1:37 AM *Subject:*
Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 16:02 -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt [...] DHCPv6/SLAAC
Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
draft-liu
: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Karl,
I definitely agree that ND needs to be secured. Also agree that neither
IPSec nor SEND are viable solutions.
I do not know if I am missing something but I have not seen a comprehensive
document with these problems detailed. I certainly don't have a solution
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
ND security is an important topic.
Let me explain why.
We consider the use of ND over 802.11p links for vehicular communications.
These links dont have ESSID nor link-layer security.
(it is not clear whether it is legal to run IP straight over
...@insidethestack.com
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; 'Karl Auer' ka...@biplane.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:45 AM
Subject: RE: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Dear Nalini,
Our draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-02 talks about a
solution for securing ND while also considering privacy. You
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu Sent:
Dienstag, 5. März 2013 14:40 To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: 6MAN
Agenda for IETF86
ND security is an important topic.
Let me explain why.
We consider the use of ND over 802.11p links for vehicular
communications. These links dont have ESSID
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Hosnieh,
I would have to read the draft and feed back about SSAS.
Some of the drafts I mentioned (ND-PD) were presented to 6MAN meeting in
Atlanta, and discussed on the email list. One of the drafts
(draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp-00
Message-
From: Nalini Elkins [mailto:nalini.elk...@insidethestack.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 16:25
To: Alexandru Petrescu; Hosnieh Rafiee; Karl Auer
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Guys,
I am going to go back and review IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) Trust Models
Subject: RE: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Dear Nalini,
Yes. That RFC is an old RFC that explained the most probable attacks that
could be used against ND. This is the main reason that ND is not at all
secure and the people who think that just privacy is enough (like what was
just implemented in windows
Karl == Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au writes:
Karl On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 16:02 -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt [...]
DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Karl == Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au writes:
Karl On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 16:02 -0800, Bob Hinden wrote:
A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6
AutoConfiguration draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt [...]
DHCPv6/SLAAC Address
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca
To: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2013 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Karl == Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au
writes:
Karl On Mon, 2013-03-04
On Mar 5, 2013, at 01:02, Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
6LoWPAN Backbone Router
draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-02.txt
That actually has received more discussion back in 2010...
(I think you want to point to -03.)
An earlier version of that draft received even more
you,
Hosnieh
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:18 PM
To: Michael Richardson; Karl Auer
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Michael
Carsten,
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Mar 5, 2013, at 01:02, Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
6LoWPAN Backbone Router
draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-02.txt
That actually has received more discussion back in 2010...
(I think you want to point
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:43 PM
To: Hosnieh Rafiee
Cc: Bob Hinden; 'Ole Troan'; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Hosneih,
It was a mix of things the chairs thought where important and prior history
[mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:43 PM
To: Hosnieh Rafiee
Cc: Bob Hinden; 'Ole Troan'; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Hosneih,
It was a mix of things the chairs thought where important and prior history
of the work. We also, of course, have
28 matches
Mail list logo
