Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-30 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Suresh, Thanks so much for yur feedback! -- Please find my comments in-line... On 06/30/2012 02:48 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I simply disagree. While I have no objection with including a crisper definition of what 'entire IPv6 header chain', I think claiming that the draft in current for

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-29 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Fernando, On 06/27/2012 10:46 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: On 06/27/2012 10:34 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I read through the draft and I am generally supportive of the sentiment behind the draft. But the draft itself is not at all clear on what constitutes a entire IPv6 header chain. Without

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-28 Thread Fernando Gont
On 06/27/2012 10:34 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I read through the draft and I am generally supportive of the sentiment behind the draft. But the draft itself is not at all clear on what constitutes a entire IPv6 header chain. Without this, I think the draft in its current form is not

Conclusion of 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-28 Thread Bob Hinden
All, Based on the feedback received, the 6man chairs believe there is consensus to adopt draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN working group document. The authors should submit the next revision as an 6MAN document. Regards, Bob Hinden and Ole Troan On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:29

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-27 Thread Dominik Elsbroek
I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN WG document. +1 Kind regards, Dominik Elsbroek IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests:

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-27 Thread Vishwas Manral
+1 too. -Vishwas On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Dominik Elsbroek dominik.elsbr...@gmail.com wrote: I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN WG document. +1 Kind regards, Dominik Elsbroek

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-27 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Chairs, On 06/13/2012 08:29 AM, Ole Trøan wrote: All, This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting Title : Security and Interoperability Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains Author(s) : F. Gont, V. Manral Filename :

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-14 Thread Rémi Després
Le 2012-06-13 à 20:46, Dave Hart a écrit : I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN WG document. +1 RD Dave Hart IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-13 Thread Dave Hart
I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN WG document. Dave Hart IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6