PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:37 AM
To: Paul Vixie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: DNS opcode DISCOVER [Re: multicast DNS without
multicast (in
IPv6 only
, January 12, 2007 4:37 AM
To: Paul Vixie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: DNS opcode DISCOVER [Re: multicast DNS without
multicast (in IPv6 only)]
[DNS opcode DISCOVER]
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
yes, it has
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: DNS opcode DISCOVER [Re: multicast DNS without
multicast (in IPv6 only)]
[DNS opcode DISCOVER]
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
yes, it has.
why, under $DIETIES green earth would you want
[DNS opcode DISCOVER]
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
yes, it has.
why, under $DIETIES green earth would you want to push a dead
technology? The IESG is dead-set against this.
because the IESG has turned over N times during those 8 years, and the idea
is still solid
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:36:31AM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
[DNS opcode DISCOVER]
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Paul Vixie wrote:
yes, it has.
why, under $DIETIES green earth would you want to push a dead
technology? The IESG is dead-set against this.
because the IESG has turned over
