Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-04-16 Thread Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam
Any update on this work? I thought we were very close to the WG LC last time and the new version is addressing all the points raised. If Yes, can we please move this forward. Kam On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi John, > > On 11-03-15 04:15 PM, John Leslie wrote: >> >>

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi John, On 11-03-15 04:15 PM, John Leslie wrote: Suresh Krishnan wrote: On 11-03-15 09:25 AM, John Leslie wrote: But I don't see the equivalent of Section 4.2 of RFC 2460, specifying the TLV format. The T is the "Next Header", the L is the "Hdr Ext Len" and V is the "Header Specific Data" a

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread John Leslie
Suresh Krishnan wrote: > On 11-03-15 09:25 AM, John Leslie wrote: But I don't see the equivalent of Section 4.2 of RFC 2460, specifying the TLV format. >>> >>> The T is the "Next Header", the L is the "Hdr Ext Len" and V is the >>> "Header Specific Data" as specified in the figure

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Kam, On 11-03-15 10:37 AM, Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam wrote: I am forgetting what the resolution was on the Hdr Options that were defined in the -01 version. I find those missing here, so i assume that they have been intentionally dropped out. I was personally in favor of those and didnt see too much

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam
I am forgetting what the resolution was on the Hdr Options that were defined in the -01 version. I find those missing here, so i assume that they have been intentionally dropped out. I was personally in favor of those and didnt see too much harm in keeping them. Other than the small nit above, the

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi John, On 11-03-15 09:25 AM, John Leslie wrote: Suresh Krishnan wrote: On 11-03-14 06:55 PM, John Leslie wrote: I notice that Section 4 calls for TLV: ] ] 4. Proposed IPv6 Extension Header format ] ] This document proposes that all IPv6 extension headers be encoded in ] a consistent

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-15 Thread John Leslie
Suresh Krishnan wrote: > On 11-03-14 06:55 PM, John Leslie wrote: >> >> I notice that Section 4 calls for TLV: >>] >>] 4. Proposed IPv6 Extension Header format >>] >>] This document proposes that all IPv6 extension headers be encoded in >>] a consistent TLV format so that it is possible for

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-14 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi John, On 11-03-14 06:55 PM, John Leslie wrote: internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: Title : An uniform format for IPv6 extension headers Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. Filename: draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt Pages : 6 Dat

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-14 Thread John Leslie
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > Title : An uniform format for IPv6 extension headers > Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > Filename: draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt > Pages : 6 > Date: 2011-03-14 > > In IPv6, optional in

I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-03-14 Thread Internet-Drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : An uniform format for IPv6 extension headers Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. Filename