On Oct 2, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
>> SEND implementation?
>>
>> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
>> given away for free?
>
> you really need to ask your lawyer.
>
> t
On Oct 2, 2010, at 13:10, Fernando Gont wrote:
> FWIW, not only I do not have a ipr-illustrated lawyer, but I'm not
> willing to pay for a lawyer to illustrate me about something I'm not
> planning to implement or ship myself, either.
Fernando,
current patent law has many interesting properties
On 02/10/2010 05:57 a.m., Randy Bush wrote:
>> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
>> SEND implementation?
>>
>> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
>> given away for free?
>
> you really need to ask your lawyer.
I thought
> e.g., would FreeBSD (developers?) need a license to ship the OS with a
> SEND implementation?
>
> -- does it really change the state of affairs if the product is sold vs.
> given away for free?
you really need to ask your lawyer.
though i am sure you will get plenty of advice here. if not,
On 01/10/2010 10:10 p.m., Bob Hinden wrote:
>> It has been pointed out to me of the IPRs on SEND/CGAs, which I
>> checked at:
[]
>> Can anybody confirm that it is required to get a license from MS
>> to implement this?
>
> I can't speak to that directly
Fernando,
On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> It has been pointed out to me of the IPRs on SEND/CGAs, which I checked at:
>
> * https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=3971
> * https://datatracker.ietf.
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Gont wrote:
Also: anybody aware of freely available implementations of SEND?
FreeBSD provides the SEND implementation (BSD license). The
implementation consists of the send kernel module and FreeBSD port. The
send module contains the kernel-side SEND support for *BS
Fernando Gont wrote:
>
> Hi, folks,
>
> It has been pointed out to me of the IPRs on SEND/CGAs, which I checked
> at:
>
> *
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=3
> 971
> *
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/
Hi, folks,
It has been pointed out to me of the IPRs on SEND/CGAs, which I checked at:
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=3971
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=3972
KAME also commented on these (and other) IPRs
