Jinmei,
to Proposed Standard. Please send substantive comments to the IPv6
mailing list. Editorial comments can be sent to the authors.
This last call will end on July 12, 2007.
Just out of curiosity, what's the current status (and planned next
step) of this last call? It seems those who
On 6-Jul-2007, at 00:31, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I hesitate to get rid or something because of this sole reason, I
think another answer would be to make paying attention to it just
optional for routing gear (or all things, honestly I really only care
about routing gear, and so does this
On 7/6/07, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6-Jul-2007, at 00:31, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I hesitate to get rid or something because of this sole reason, I
think another answer would be to make paying attention to it just
optional for routing gear (or all things, honestly I really
[Note that I am not replying out of a desire to engage in advocacy;
you should read this more as editorial summaries of discussions that
have already happened here when the questions you raised were asked
before.]
On 6-Jul-2007, at 10:46, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I recognize that a host
On 7/2/07, Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 28 juin 2007, ext Bob Hinden a écrit :
This starts a two week IPv6 working group last call on advancing
Title : Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6
Author(s) : J. Abley, et al.
Hi Chris,
I think the general view was that RH0, can be deprecated and a new
more secure Routing Header can be used to get the functionality for
required.
I have put a draft for the checks required, in any such header. I
intend to modify the draft to take care of introducing the new Routing
On 7/5/07, Vishwas Manral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,
I think the general view was that RH0, can be deprecated and a new
more secure Routing Header can be used to get the functionality for
required.
So, sure... my fear is that lots of baked code/hardware today is going
to do 'funny
I support the promotion of draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt to a Proposed
Standard.
IMO the editor and author(s) did an exceptionally good job in distilling our
many and often somewhat divergent comments into the document we're considering.
The above having been said, I'd like to share one
Le jeudi 28 juin 2007, ext Bob Hinden a écrit :
This starts a two week IPv6 working group last call on advancing
Title : Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6
Author(s) : J. Abley, et al.
Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt
Ship it.
Brian
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
(Yes, it's my first post, but I thought it would be good to establish early
on a track record of keeping on-topic and moving things in a positive
direction...)
I've read the draft, and the CanSecWest slides that it references.
The network nodes I've worked on have deployed filters to prevent RH0
This starts a two week IPv6 working group last call on advancing
Title : Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6
Author(s) : J. Abley, et al.
Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt
Pages : 9
Date:
12 matches
Mail list logo
