AIL PROTECTED]Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Envoyé le : Jeudi, 14 Septembre 2006, 6h11mn 12sObjet : Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them ar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them are
a must in an IPv6 environment. Without it Neighbor Discovery will not work and
so address resolution.
Our system enables one to set an MTU for and IPv6 address. So it is very much
possible
ECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
Hi Sasson,
It s
> I wonder if the grouping together devices with the same MTU/MRU
> capabilities into different on-link prefixes, and then having a
> per-prefix MTU would overcome some of the per-neighbour MTU issues
> identified at that time.
Well, fe80::/10 is an on-link prefix and in some use-cases
there might
ssage-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
Hi Sasson,
It should be 2. the MTU of th
> To: sasson, shuki
> Cc: harris, arthur; ting, dennis; viswanadha, kamakshi; ipv6@ietf.org;
> nathanson, daphna
> Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi all, as we all know Link Local addres
Hi Sasson,
It should be 2. the MTU of the NIC device on the link (assuming it is
properly configured). You can certainly use 1280 bytes as an MTU but if
you link can support substantially larger MTU, it is inefficient to use
1280.
Cheers
Suresh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, as we all k
Thanks!
Shuki
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:02 AM
To: sasson, shuki
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; harris, arthur; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; viswanadha, kamakshi;
nathanson, daphna
Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Mark Smith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:27 AM
To: sasson, shuki
Cc: harris, arthur; ting, dennis; viswanadha, kamakshi; ipv6@ietf.org;
nathanson, daphna
Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400
[EMAIL
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them
> are a must in an IPv6 environment. Without it Neighbor Discovery will not
> work and so address resolution.
> Our system enables one to set an MTU for and IP
10 matches
Mail list logo