Hi.
If I understand what you are asking correctly, I think you have misread
RFC 2675/2460. The jumbogram option lives in the hop-by-by-hop
extension header (Header Type (Next header value) 0, option type code C2
hex). The routing header is a a different extension header (Header Type
43). J
Hi Bert,
Thanks for pointing this out. I could not find any reference to the
RH0 header either.
Thanks again,
Vishwas
On Dec 4, 2007 2:47 AM, Manfredi, Albert E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps this was covered in the RH0 deprecation discussions and I missed
> it. How will jumbograms be code
Hi Bert,
The jumbogram length is specified in a hop by hop option along with the
length of 0 in the IPv6 datagram. RH0 is not required in any way for jumbograms
to work.
Thanks
Suresh
(ccing [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is the mailing list for ipv6 maintenance)
-Original Message-
From: Ma
