In your letter dated Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:15:03 +0900 you wrote:
>So, the description of this rule should be like:
>
>If the implementation can know and manage the coupling of a next-hop and a pre
>fix
>delegated from it, then the corresponding prefix should be chosen as the sourc
>e address.
>For e
Hi, Mikael, Hemant,
I think Mikael's concern is fair and it should be addressed clearer in this
document.
I agree that this rule is applicable when
- SLAAC is used for address assignment.
, or
- DHCPv6 server/relay is used for address assignment and it's on the router
sending RA.
Also, I under
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 6:01 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
section 2.3
>Anyhow, the above text seems fine to me fro
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
Here is an attempt to explain the text above from section 2.3 of the
document that I have included between squared brackets above. SA was
acquired using DHCPv6 where the DHCPv6 response did arrive to the client
on the IPv6 link-local address
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:04 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
section 2.3
Mikael,
>Right now I couldn't help reading the
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:04 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
section 2.3
>I'm thinking in the terms of multiple router
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Brian Haberman
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:22 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
section 2.3
>Does the DHCPv6 response contain
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
It's the IPv6 default router for the DHCPv6 client that sends a RA with
the M-bit set and seeing such an RA the client initiates DHCPv6. Or the
client could initiate DHCPv6 even on receiving an RA with the M-bit
cleared. But the fact still r
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Mikael,
On 3/28/11 4:25 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Hello.
I read through 2.3 of the draft, and I am a bit unclear as to how the
next-hop should be selected.
In the case of my SLAAC machine, I see the next-hop for my default-route
as a LL addr
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:25 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02 section
2.3
Mikael,
>In the case of getting address using D
Hi Mikael,
On 3/28/11 4:25 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I read through 2.3 of the draft, and I am a bit unclear as to how the
> next-hop should be selected.
>
> In the case of my SLAAC machine, I see the next-hop for my default-route
> as a LL address. How would the SA and the d
11 matches
Mail list logo
