Re : MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Kayumba .H Thierry
AIL PROTECTED]Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Envoyé le : Jeudi, 14 Septembre 2006, 6h11mn 12sObjet : Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them ar

Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Elwyn Davies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them are a must in an IPv6 environment. Without it Neighbor Discovery will not work and so address resolution. Our system enables one to set an MTU for and IPv6 address. So it is very much possible

RE: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread sasson_shuki
ECTED] -Original Message- From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. Hi Sasson, It s

RE: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Templin, Fred L
> I wonder if the grouping together devices with the same MTU/MRU > capabilities into different on-link prefixes, and then having a > per-prefix MTU would overcome some of the per-neighbour MTU issues > identified at that time. Well, fe80::/10 is an on-link prefix and in some use-cases there might

RE: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Templin, Fred L
ssage- From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. Hi Sasson, It should be 2. the MTU of th

Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Mark Smith
> To: sasson, shuki > Cc: harris, arthur; ting, dennis; viswanadha, kamakshi; ipv6@ietf.org; > nathanson, daphna > Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi all, as we all know Link Local addres

Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Sasson, It should be 2. the MTU of the NIC device on the link (assuming it is properly configured). You can certainly use 1280 bytes as an MTU but if you link can support substantially larger MTU, it is inefficient to use 1280. Cheers Suresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, as we all k

RE: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread sasson_shuki
Thanks! Shuki -Original Message- From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:02 AM To: sasson, shuki Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; harris, arthur; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; viswanadha, kamakshi; nathanson, daphna Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. Hi

RE: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread sasson_shuki
-Original Message- From: Mark Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 10:27 AM To: sasson, shuki Cc: harris, arthur; ting, dennis; viswanadha, kamakshi; ipv6@ietf.org; nathanson, daphna Subject: Re: MTU on a Link Local Address. On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400 [EMAIL

Re: MTU on a Link Local Address.

2006-09-14 Thread Mark Smith
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:02:02 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, as we all know Link Local addresses and communicating through them > are a must in an IPv6 environment. Without it Neighbor Discovery will not > work and so address resolution. > Our system enables one to set an MTU for and IP