RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-28 Thread Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35
Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 1:47 To: Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35 Cc: Jari Arkko; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35 wrote: These hosts will still

RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-28 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35 wrote: Yes, but that is experimental so it is not mandatory to implement either. So, again I say there is no mandatory way in which a network management application can reliably discover IPv6 networks. This is why the draft recommends making

Re: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-28 Thread Jari Arkko
Agreed. --Jari Pekka Savola wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35 wrote: Yes, but that is experimental so it is not mandatory to implement either. So, again I say there is no mandatory way in which a network management application can reliably discover IPv6 networks.

RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-28 Thread Jeff Pickering
Savola Cc: Jari Arkko; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt Agreed. However, if it is mandatory then there is more of a leg to stand on in requiring it. -Original Message- From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-28 Thread Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35
Subject: RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt Ron, Sorry if this has already been asked. But why change icmp ehco request if IND is mandated and is multicast? Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pashby

RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-23 Thread Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35
Subject: RE: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35 wrote: 2) Requiring all nodes implement Inverse Neighbor Discover with the addidtion of the response holdoff timer. The feature exists. But an all-nodes mandatory

Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-21 Thread Pashby, Ronald W CTR NSWCDD-B35
Title: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt This draft was presented in Paris, however there was not enough time to disscuss it there. There was some discussion on the list regarding using an all hosts multicast for network discovery. This draft does not add

Re: Solicit comments on draft-pashby-ipv6-network-discovery-00.txt

2005-09-21 Thread Jari Arkko
Hi, Some quick comments: I think its valuable to work on limits to ensure that existing mechanisms don't cause denial-of-service or flooding. Good network security mandates good network management for detecting unauthorized devices on the network. It would seem that the recommended