Test, please ignore.
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Hi,
On 2 June 2012 16:13, Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
I seem to remember seeing, some time ago, a list of lots and lots of
test IPv6 addresses. That is, IPv6 addresses that could be fed into
programs to check whether they were properly interpreted.
For a project I am currently
I seem to remember seeing, some time ago, a list of lots and lots of
test IPv6 addresses. That is, IPv6 addresses that could be fed into
programs to check whether they were properly interpreted.
For a project I am currently working on it would be great not to have to
generate all those fiddly
On 1 Jun 2012, at 23:13, Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
I seem to remember seeing, some time ago, a list of lots and lots of
test IPv6 addresses. That is, IPv6 addresses that could be fed into
programs to check whether they were properly interpreted.
Just use getaddrinfo() and all
Hi, all.
TAHI Project would like to announce about holding
10th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability test event again.
Date: Jan. 25-29, 2010
Venue: Makuhari Messe, Makuhari, Japan
Target: Conformance Interoperability tests
* IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-2 http
Dear all,
Registration for the 9th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test event is
started today!
If you are planning to participate to the event, you can register in
http://www.tahi.org/inop/9thinterop.html
Note : The early registration discount is until 17:00 JST Apr. 16, 2007
Hello all,
TAHI Project is planning to hold the 9th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test
Event at 14th - 18th May, 2007.
Summary information of the event.
- Venue: Nippon Convention Center (Makuhari Messe), Chiba, Japan.
- Date: May 14 - May 18, 2007
- Registration Information: coming soon!
More
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Marcelo is working on organizing a SEND interop test sometime next year,
probably in Madrid. We are trying to identify implementors so that we can
find out whether there would be enough interest to hold the test. I have
private email from a couple people who told me they have implementations
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Mesg sent 2005 Dec 30 11:50 (GMT-4)
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Dear All,
TAHI Projcet is organizing its 8th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test Event.
The event will be held from 23th - 27th January 2006 at the Makuhari messe of
Chiba Japan.
Registration are avairable from 10 November 2005 at:
http://www.tahi.org/inop/8thinterop.html
Early registration
test email, sorry.
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Just a test, sorry
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
please ignore.
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
Dear All,
This is a reminder that TAHI Projcet is organizing its 6th TAHI IPv6
Interoperability Test Event. The event will be held from 24th - 28th
January 2005 at the Makuhari messe of Chiba Japan.
Registration is avairable at:
http://www.tahi.org/inop/6thinterop.html
Deadline to register is 31
Dear All,
TAHI Projcet is organizing its 6th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test Event.
The event will be held from 24th - 28th January 2005 at the Makuhari messe of Chiba
Japan.
Registration will be avairable from 17 November 2004 at:
http://www.tahi.org/inop/6thinterop.html
Deadline to register
Dear All,
TAHI Projcet is organizing its 6th TAHI IPv6 Interoperability Test Event.
The event will be held from 24th - 28th January 2005 at the Makuhari messe of Chiba
Japan.
Registration will be avairable from 17 November 2004 at:
http://www.tahi.org/inop/6thinterop.html
Deadline to register
Dear All,
This is your last chance to register for the 5th IPv6 Plugtests being held from 11th -
15th October 2004 at the Sofitel of Cannes-Mandelieu French Riviera !
You now have only 1 WEEK to register at: www.etsi.org/plugtests/IPv6.htm
Deadline to register is 24 September 2004
TAHI IRISA
will provide the following tests:
o Conformance tests : IPv6 Core Protocols, NAT-PT, 6to4, OSPF.v3,
RIPng, MIPv6 , IPsec ...
o Interoperability tests : MIPv6, NEMO, IPsec, IKENAT-PT, 6to4,
OSPF.v3, RIPng...
o DHCPv6
And many more tests possibilities !
If you need to test other
to test other features or even to provide tests, please
contact us at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will also be possible to apply for the IPv6 Ready Logo during the
event!
Please read this section to know what can be expected.
http://www.etsi.org/plugtests/upcoming/ipv6/IPv6readyLogo.htm
Patrick Guillemin
tests:
o Conformance tests : IPv6 Core Protocols, NAT-PT, 6to4, OSPF.v3,
RIPng, MIPv6 , IPsec
o Interoperability tests : MIPv6, NEMO, IPsec, IKENAT-PT, 6to4,
OSPF.v3, RIPng
o DHCPv6
And many more other tests possibilities !
If you need to test other features or even to provide
Brian,
Based on the analysis in my last message, I also agree with Pekka.
But, I would still prefer to see the rate limiting text include the term
messages/bytes instead of just messages. If it is too complicated
I'm just not seeing it; if it is problematic, that is a different story.
I'm
Pekka,
Sorry for the delayed response, but I've been off pondering this one.
It seems to me that the question is more of a philisophical/operational
nature and not readily tackled from a theoretical perspective. The
point comes down to whom do you trust? Do you trust hosts to be
well behaved, or
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
[...]
Assuming we are on the same page,
Yep.
there are two worst-case threat
models to consider:
Threat model 1:
*
Node B (i.e., the router) is congested in terms of CPU load, memory
utilization, etc, while the network path
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
===
(f) Finally, in order to limit the bandwidth and forwarding costs
incurred sending ICMPv6 error messages, an IPv6 node MUST limit
the rate of ICMPv6 error messages it sends.
Fred,
I mostly agree with Pekka here.
Specific comments inline:
I think we may have glossed over this in earlier discussion,
but I believe
'B' should be allowed as an expression of either messages OR bytes.
Size *does* matter in certain cases, and expressing 'B'
only in terms
of a
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
===
(f) Finally, in order to limit the bandwidth and forwarding costs
incurred sending ICMPv6 error messages, an IPv6 node MUST limit
the rate of ICMPv6 error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Pekka that this compllicates the text and the
implementation. Moreover, N (the long-term average) can be
in number of packets per seconds or a fraction of the attached
link's bandwidth. Don't you think, the size of the packet
will be covered if N is
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
Note: the decision whether or not to drop an incoming packet
can be made in packet mode, ignoring packet sizes, or in
byte mode, taking into account the size of the incoming
packet. The performance implications of the choice between
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
Note: the decision whether or not to drop an incoming packet
can be made in packet mode, ignoring packet sizes, or in
byte mode, taking into account the size of the incoming
packet. The performance implications of the
Here is the final revision of the text that everyone seems to agree
upon. I will put this in the draft. Please let me know if anyone has
anymore comments on this.
===
(f) Finally, in order to limit the bandwidth and forwarding costs
Mukesh,
See comments below:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the final revision of the text that everyone seems to agree upon. I will put this in the draft. Please let me know if anyone has anymore comments on this. === (f) Finally, in order to
Mesg sent Wed 31 Dec 2003 1252 GMT
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
this is a test
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
+AD4APA-/STYLE+AD4-
+ADw-/HEAD+AD4-
+ADw-BODY bgColor+AD0AIw-ff+AD4-
+ADw-DIV+AD4APA-FONT size+AD0-2+AD4-test+ADw-/FONT+AD4APA-/DIV+AD4APA-/BODY+AD4APA-/HTML+AD4-
36 matches
Mail list logo
