Hi Markku,
Sorry about the delay in responding.
I thought I had better read RFC 2461 more closely
before answering.
- Original Message -
From: Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 3, 2004 5:44 pm
Subject: Re: oDAD: allowing RS from tentative addresses (Re: opti
Minor detail correction...
> From: Greg Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please also be aware there is no issue for default router selection
> on hosts, (which is what the IsRouter flag is for) since they never
> receive the RS in the first place.
IsRouter only implies router, but it does not need to
Hi Nick.
Nick 'Sharkey' Moore wrote:
On 2004-06-03, Greg Daley wrote:
RFC2461's Section 7.2.3 describes the router's own recovery from
this incorrect state, by sending subsequent router or neigbour
advertisements.
Considering that the device doing optimistic DAD which erroneously
causes the IsRoute
On 2004-06-02, Erik Nordmark wrote:
>
> Alternative 2:
> Why not conceptually define the override flag for the RS to accomplish
> a 2 packet exchange?
> A compatible way to do this is to define a new "tentative source link-layer
> address option" which would only be used by the receiver if it does
On 2004-06-03, Greg Daley wrote:
>
> RFC2461's Section 7.2.3 describes the router's own recovery from
> this incorrect state, by sending subsequent router or neigbour
> advertisements.
>
> Considering that the device doing optimistic DAD which erroneously
> causes the IsRouter flag to be unset ha
Hi Erik,
Erik Nordmark wrote:
If Optimistic DAD doesn't allow for unicast responses to
router solicitations, the potential for fast advertisement
to such hosts is severely diminished.
So how could something work?
I'm assuming that somehow, perhaps using a token bucket filter
instead of a fix 1 eve
> If Optimistic DAD doesn't allow for unicast responses to
> router solicitations, the potential for fast advertisement
> to such hosts is severely diminished.
So how could something work?
I'm assuming that somehow, perhaps using a token bucket filter
instead of a fix 1 every 3 seconds limit, we
G'day Sharkey,
Nick 'Sharkey' Moore wrote:
[G'day Eric, thanks for your input ...]
On 2004-06-01, Erik Nordmark wrote:
[Pekka Savola wrote:]
1) The draft specifies that instead of using a tentative address as the
source address for RS, another address or the unspecified address should be
used inste
