Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6)

2004-03-22 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
(Sorry for not responding sooner) On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 20:10:13 -0500 (EST), Suresh Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Don't if it is concrete or not but Section 4.2.4 of RFC2026 states Note: Standards track specifications normally must not depend on other standards track

Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6)

2004-03-09 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Jinmei, Don't if it is concrete or not but Section 4.2.4 of RFC2026 states Note: Standards track specifications normally must not depend on other standards track specifications which are at a lower maturity level or on non standards track specifications other than referenced

reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6)

2004-03-08 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 03:00:08 -0500, Ralph Droms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jinmei - I mistyped and you guessed what I had intended to ask. Good catch and thanks for the clarification. Can anyone supply a direct reference to an explicit statement that a DS spec cannot have a normative

Re: reference dependency (DS to PS) (Re: [rfc2462bis] M/O flags and DHCPv6)

2004-03-08 Thread Pekka Savola
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: Jinmei - I mistyped and you guessed what I had intended to ask. Good catch and thanks for the clarification. Can anyone supply a direct reference to an explicit statement that a DS spec cannot have a