On 2013-10-10 00:02, Christopher Palmer wrote:
John and Lorenzo beat me to it J.
Example:
Samantha has native IPv6 and Teredo.
Albert has Teredo only.
But what do you do with the more and more common case[1] where one gets
native IPv6 and IPv4-over-DSlite; especially considering
On 10-10-2013 14:01, Brzozowski, John Jason wrote:
Chris can you share details of the brokenness check? What variables are
considered?
Perhaps native IPv6 on the client with firewall rules that do not permit
inbound traffic. A legit issue that can be expected to pop up.
Also, is there any
Hi,
when using OpenVPN dualstack tunnels, I notice that Windows doesn't
realize that it has working IPv6 connectivity for a long time so it
won't use the newly established IPv6 connectivity until re-checking.
Is there any way to manually trigger Windows to re-check IPv6
connectivity?
Best
On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:19 PM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
I applaud what you guys are doing, really, but from my perspective it looks
like the reliance on Teredo is really quite scary given what we see out there
about how it behaves, and I'm kinda wondering what I'm missing here that
On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
I have not gathered data on Teredo-to-Teredo reliability. The connection
failure numbers quoted above make use of a Teredo Relay. But this
teredo-to-teredo connection failure rate in the Internet appears to be a
critical assumption here
FYI, after I put up a blog post[1] about this topic this morning, there
are some interesting conversations happening on Hacker News and Reddit:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6526943
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/1o4zuk/microsoft_the_best_xbox_one_ga
ming_experience/
In my post,
* Mark Townsley
On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
I have not gathered data on Teredo-to-Teredo reliability. The
connection failure numbers quoted above make use of a Teredo Relay.
But this teredo-to-teredo connection failure rate in the Internet
appears to be a critical
On Oct 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
My concern about Teredo's robustness however still remains.
We've been polling users with IPv6 tests embedded in a Google Ad campaign for
some years now. We were interested in teredo, so we thought that if one of
the
On 11/10/2013, at 2:02 AM, Mark Townsley m...@townsley.net wrote:
On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
I have not gathered data on Teredo-to-Teredo reliability. The connection
failure numbers quoted above make use of a Teredo Relay. But this
teredo-to-teredo connection
On the native side, it's important to note that the traffic is IPsec protected,
so the protocol and port information may be obfuscated and is in general is not
predictable.
IKEv2 traffic is predictable, but we won't be using UPnP on the IPv6 side to
enable in-bound IKEv2. Hopefully people
Hi all,
I wonder if you could point me towards the right direction here...
2 Debian boxes running Quagga, connected to 2 different transit
providers, both receiving a full v4 tables and working fine. iBGP fine etc.
I've started to add v6 to our transits (sorry, a little behind!).
I have (so
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Christopher Palmer wrote:
The thing about protocols like UPnP - the vendors who would ignore an
IETF recommendation are likely to be the same vendors to skip out on
making an adequate UPnP stack. Most people today do NOT have home
routers that support UPnP.
Do you have
12 matches
Mail list logo
