Github user szape commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32913023
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/util/FiniteStormFileSpout.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595485#comment-14595485
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in th
Github user szape commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32913535
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/wordcount/SpoutSourceWordCount
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595497#comment-14595497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in th
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/850#issuecomment-114038819
Merging. Thanks for the PR. Going for getClass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595505#comment-14595505
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2229:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/842#issuecomment-114039557
+1, merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811#issuecomment-114039683
Is there anything blocking this? If not, feel free to go ahead and merge
this. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32914310
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/wordcount/SpoutSourceWordCount
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595508#comment-14595508
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in th
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/790#issuecomment-114039753
Good fix, thx. Merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595507#comment-14595507
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2155:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/642#issuecomment-114040994
Another ping. @mjsax would you like to pick it up? There is a test in
TaskCancelTest#cancelJob, which implements this for a test as a static method.
Would be nice to refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595511#comment-14595511
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1818:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/248#issuecomment-114042530
OK going to merge and adding the warning. Makes it more comfortable to run
a stand-alone cluster in the cloud. :) Thanks for the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595514#comment-14595514
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2245:
---
Yes, the way it would currently wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595513#comment-14595513
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-938:
--
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/854#issuecomment-114043020
I think this code actually simply drops oversized records, or am I
overlooking something?
Also, outputting oversized records on WARN debug level seems heavy,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595518#comment-14595518
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1085:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/642#issuecomment-114043438
@rainiraj replied, that he is still on it (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1818)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595521#comment-14595521
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1818:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595523#comment-14595523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2242:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/852#issuecomment-114043900
+1
I would go as far as to remove it, as this will work in a very limited way
and requires direct client to TaskManager communication.
`DataSet.colle
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/642#issuecomment-114044225
Ah, didn't check the JIRA. Thanks for pointing this out. @rainiraj, can you
look at the test I've mentioned and remove the code there and use your new
feature? :)
---
If yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595526#comment-14595526
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1818:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595527#comment-14595527
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2248:
---
+1 it would be cool to have a {{-q}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595528#comment-14595528
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32915439
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32915549
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595529#comment-14595529
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2242:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595530#comment-14595530
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/852#issuecomment-114044528
I've opened the issue to deprecate, but I think removing is good. +1 to
remove as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#issuecomment-114044907
I think a good addition would be to remember the number of elements in the
set, and use that to validate that the deserialization worked properly.
Serializers may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595534#comment-14595534
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595536#comment-14595536
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2214:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/844#issuecomment-114045049
The build side hinted here is also the constant (loop invariant) side,
correct?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user gyfora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#discussion_r32916035
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/state/PartitionedStreamOperatorState.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/849
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32916185
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595545#comment-14595545
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff i
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32916320
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595550#comment-14595550
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2161:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595548#comment-14595548
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff i
Github user gyfora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#discussion_r32916334
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/state/PartitionedStreamOperatorState.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/842
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/805#issuecomment-114046659
To add more jars to the Classpath, you can write the test in the following
way: The test itself is just a wrapper that instantiates a custom classloader
with your ext
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-2229.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
Fixed via c0d3fed.
> Data sets involving non-primitive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595551#comment-14595551
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2229:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/848#discussion_r32916595
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/source/FromElementsFunction.java
---
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595557#comment-14595557
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2124:
---
Github user jreiffers commented on a diff i
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/677#issuecomment-114049969
Does this subsume #297?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595571#comment-14595571
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-297:
--
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/790
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-2155.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
Fixed via ab40e5d.
> Add an additional checkstyle vali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595572#comment-14595572
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2155:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/764#issuecomment-114054802
Sure. Why not. Let's discuss tomorrow at the Meetup.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32919318
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/singlejoin/SingleJoinTopology.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595706#comment-14595706
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in th
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/852#issuecomment-114058851
I would prefer deprecating it first and removing it in the next major
release. If we would do so we should create a JIRA issue to keep track of
removing it for the future rel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595720#comment-14595720
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2242:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595725#comment-14595725
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2193:
-
I think there is currently no partition functio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595738#comment-14595738
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2198:
-
The approach to disallow folder creation is sue
GitHub user mbalassi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855
[streaming] Properly forward rich window function calls to wrapped fuâ¦
â¦nctions
Open and close were not called, because of the wrapping in windowing. I
should have realized this when fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595769#comment-14595769
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1956:
---
GitHub user mbalassi opened a pull request:
Github user szape commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32925004
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/singlejoin/SingleJoinTopology.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595800#comment-14595800
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user szape commented on a diff in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595813#comment-14595813
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2243:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in th
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/853#discussion_r32925744
--- Diff:
flink-contrib/flink-storm-compatibility/flink-storm-compatibility-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/stormcompatibility/singlejoin/SingleJoinTopology.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595818#comment-14595818
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2190:
-
Sounds good!
> Enhance stream decoration/compr
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/856
[FLINK-2143] Added ReduceFunctionWithInverse
(The first commit is the same as the second commit in PR 684)
I didn't add an overload to reduce, but instead created
ReduceFunctionWithInverse as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595824#comment-14595824
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2143:
---
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Márton Balassi created FLINK-2256:
-
Summary: Handling Broker failures on the KafkaSink side
Key: FLINK-2256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2256
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Im
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/814#issuecomment-114080543
I am unsure of where this leads us. The purpose of `Writable` is to make
sure that we can use the Writable's custom serialization. If the type
`Writable` itself is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595827#comment-14595827
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2194:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595830#comment-14595830
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2197:
-
How can we solve this? Can we change the packag
Márton Balassi created FLINK-2257:
-
Summary: Open and close of RichWindowFunctions is not called
Key: FLINK-2257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2257
Project: Flink
Issue Typ
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855#issuecomment-114082949
Add reference to FLINK-2257 when merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595836#comment-14595836
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2257:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/684#issuecomment-114083769
Concerning my comment about where to put the code:
There is so much code being added to Flink right now. The committers have
to be ultimately the ones that ma
Github user ggevay commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/684#issuecomment-114086691
I see your point, no problem.
Although, I would like to put my next pull request (856) to the core,
because that code would be very awkward to put into contrib. Bu
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/857
[FLINK-2255] [streaming] Fixed a bug in TopSpeedWindowing examples
Added the *1000, and modified the reference output of the ITCases.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-1723:
---
Summary: Add cross validation for model evaluation (was: Add cross
validation for par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595879#comment-14595879
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2255:
---
GitHub user ggevay opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-1723:
---
Description:
Cross validation [1] is a standard tool to estimate the test error for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-1723:
---
Description:
Cross validation [1] is a standard tool to select to estimate the test er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-1723:
---
Description:
Cross validation [1] is a standard tool to select to estimate the test er
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2258:
--
Summary: Add hyperparameter optimization to FlinkML
Key: FLINK-2258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2258
Project: Flink
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595886#comment-14595886
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2099:
-
+1, very nice idea
We can still have a way to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595910#comment-14595910
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2204:
-
Hmm, looks again like a Tez issue.
No Flink c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikio Braun reassigned FLINK-2157:
--
Assignee: (was: Mikio Braun)
> Create evaluation framework for ML library
> ---
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2259:
--
Summary: Support training Estimators using a (train, validation,
test) split of the available data
Key: FLINK-2259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-225
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikio Braun reassigned FLINK-2157:
--
Assignee: Mikio Braun
> Create evaluation framework for ML library
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595933#comment-14595933
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114109425
I had a look at your code. A lot of it looks good.
The one thing I would really like to change is the modification of the
execution graph state machine. That
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/772#issuecomment-114117337
OK so as I understand it this PR is about splitting the prediction with
Vector and LabeledVector input into two functions instead of one as it is now.
This allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595956#comment-14595956
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2116:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2260:
--
Summary: Have a complete model evaluation and selection framework
for FlinkML
Key: FLINK-2260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2260
Projec
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114123970
I agree that extending the state graph is critical. However, IMHO it is the
right way to go. I would rather spend more time on getting it right in the
first place, than int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595969#comment-14595969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull req
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo