[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9895) 0.96 Import utility can't import an exported file from 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9895: - Release Note: To import 0.94 exported file in 0.96 cluster or onwards, you need to set system pr

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9895) 0.96 Import utility can't import an exported file from 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9895: - Release Note: To import 0.94 exported file in 0.96 cluster or onwards, you need to set system pr

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9895) 0.96 Import utility can't import an exported file from 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9895: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9918) MasterAddressTracker & ZKNamespaceManager ZK listeners are missed after master recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819768#comment-13819768 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9918: -- Make sense. I'll check in the patch then. Tha

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9895) 0.96 Import utility can't import an exported file from 0.94

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9895: - Fix Version/s: 0.96.1 0.98.0 > 0.96 Import utility can't import an exported fi

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9918) MasterAddressTracker & ZKNamespaceManager ZK listeners are missed after master recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9918: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9918) MasterAddressTracker & ZKNamespaceManager ZK listeners are missed after master recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9918: - Fix Version/s: 0.96.1 0.98.0 > MasterAddressTracker & ZKNamespaceManager ZK li

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9360) Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819784#comment-13819784 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9360: -- With hbase-9895 checked in, a user can set up

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9360) Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13820278#comment-13820278 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9360: -- Thanks [~jmspaggi]! Very nice of you to try i

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9255) TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9255: Summary: TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux Key: HBASE-9255 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9255 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9255) TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9255: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse li

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9255) TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9255: - Attachment: hbase-9255.patch > TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux > --

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9255) TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13742793#comment-13742793 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9255: -- [~te...@apache.org] Because {code} HTable ht

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9257) TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9257: Summary: TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition Key: HBASE-9257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9257 Project: HBa

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-9257) TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong reassigned HBASE-9257: Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong > TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a r

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9257) TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9257: - Attachment: hbase-9257.patch Ideally we could use errors.isEmpty to replace hasError boolean whil

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9257) TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9257: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9255) TestAsyncProcess#testErrorsServers is flaky on suse linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9255: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks [~te...@apache.org] for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9257) TestAsyncProcess#testFailAndSuccess fails sometime due to a race condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9257: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-8960: - Attachment: hbase-8690-v4.patch The testWorkerAbort failed due to a race condition as it kills al

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13744099#comment-13744099 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8960: -- I just integrated the v4 patch into 0.95 and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8348) Polish the migration to 0.96

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13744602#comment-13744602 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8348: -- This tool is great! Today I populated some da

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8450) Update hbase-default.xml and general recommendations to better suit current hw, h2, experience, etc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13744617#comment-13744617 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8450: -- [~saint@gmail.com] {quote}max versions no

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8348) Polish the migration to 0.96

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13745160#comment-13745160 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8348: -- {quote} I think it is okay to use error as th

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13745161#comment-13745161 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8960: -- The testDisallowWritesInRecovering failed aga

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8450) Update hbase-default.xml and general recommendations to better suit current hw, h2, experience, etc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13745174#comment-13745174 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8450: -- Thanks [~saint@gmail.com]! HBase-9271 is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9210) "hbase shell -d" doesn't print out exception stack trace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9210: - Attachment: hbase-9210-v1.patch Add handling when error object doesn't have cause method. Thanks.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-8960: - Attachment: hbase-8960-fix-disallowWritesInRecovering.patch Reworked the test case "disallowWrite

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9210) "hbase shell -d" doesn't print out exception stack trace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9210: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-8960: - Attachment: hbase-8960-fix-disallowWritesInRecovering-addendum.patch The reworked one failed in t

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9278) Reading Pre-namespace meta table edits kills the reader

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13748042#comment-13748042 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9278: -- {quote} needed to support 0.94->0.96 replicat

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9318) Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9318: Summary: Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one Key: HBASE-9318 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9318 Project: HBase I

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9318) Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9318: - Attachment: hbase-9318.patch > Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9318) Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13748755#comment-13748755 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9318: -- [~jmhsieh] Thanks for looking this. {quote}

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9324) TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun & testMemberCommitCommsFailure are flaky on Suse OS

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9324: Summary: TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun & testMemberCommitCommsFailure are flaky on Suse OS Key: HBASE-9324 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9324) TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun & testMemberCommitCommsFailure are flaky on Suse OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9324: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSim

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9324) TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun & testMemberCommitCommsFailure are flaky on Suse OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9324: - Attachment: hbase-9324.patch > TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun &

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9318) Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13748971#comment-13748971 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9318: -- [~jmhsieh] Are you good at the patch? I didn'

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7709) Infinite loop possible in Master/Master replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13748982#comment-13748982 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-7709: -- I reviewed the trunk patch. One thing I notic

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9324) TestProcedureMember#testMemberCommitException, testSimpleRun & testMemberCommitCommsFailure are flaky on Suse OS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9324: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.95.2 0.96.0 Hadoop Flags: Review

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9318) Procedure#waitForLatch may not throw error even there is one

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9318: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 0.98.0 Hadoop Flags: Review

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8960) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testLogReplayForDisablingTable fails sometimes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13750546#comment-13750546 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8960: -- [~saint@gmail.com] Should I close this JI

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-7709) Infinite loop possible in Master/Master replication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13750727#comment-13750727 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-7709: -- I reviewed 0.94 and trunk patch. They both lo

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9360) Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9360: Summary: Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time Key: HBASE-9360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9360 Project: HBase

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9360) Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13752600#comment-13752600 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9360: -- Thanks a lot for the inputs on this. I haven'

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9368) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testDelayedDeleteOnFailure fails on occasion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13752823#comment-13752823 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9368: -- Sure. Let me take a look at this. Thanks.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8701) distributedLogReplay need to apply wal edits in the receiving order of those edits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13752882#comment-13752882 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8701: -- [~saint@gmail.com] The patch just needs r

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9368) TestDistributedLogSplitting.testDelayedDeleteOnFailure fails on occasion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13753027#comment-13753027 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9368: -- [~saint@gmail.com] Good news is that test

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9110) Meta region edits not recovered while migrating to 0.96.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13753079#comment-13753079 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9110: -- 0.94 has strange setup. The ROOT table could

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Summary: Region could get lost during assignment (was: TestFullLogReconstruction#testReconstruct

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Component/s: Region Assignment > Region could get lost during assignment > --

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13754245#comment-13754245 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9387: -- After checked the log, the root cause is that

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Attachment: hbase-9387.patch [~te...@apache.org] I posted a patch to minimize RS aborting situati

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Attachment: (was: hbase-9387.patch) > Region could get lost during assignment > -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Attachment: hbase-9387.patch > Region could get lost during assignment >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Attachment: (was: hbase-9387.patch) > Region could get lost during assignment > -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9387: - Attachment: hbase-9387.patch > Region could get lost during assignment >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13754896#comment-13754896 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9387: -- If we abort RS when state is in un-expected s

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9387) Region could get lost during assignment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13754846#comment-13754846 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9387: -- This seems a classic retry issue because when

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong reassigned HBASE-9390: Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong > coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8450) Update hbase-default.xml and general recommendations to better suit current hw, h2, experience, etc.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13757402#comment-13757402 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-8450: -- [~saint@gmail.com] I happened to check cu

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-9376) TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~/hbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong reassigned HBASE-9376: Assignee: Jeffrey Zhong > TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9376) TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~/hbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9376: - Attachment: hbase-9376.patch This issue is caused by an early optimization where we only restart

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9376) TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~/hbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9376: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster root

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9390: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > coprocessors observers are not called during a recover

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9390: - Attachment: hbase-9390.patch I combined the Nicolas patch into the hbase-9390.patch. I modified

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759279#comment-13759279 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9390: -- Ok. Gary raised a valid point. Let me keep th

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759529#comment-13759529 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9390: -- {quote} So if we keep the boolean, we will ac

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9411) Increment / decrement of rpcCount in RpcServer#Connection is not protected by synchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759433#comment-13759433 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9411: -- Looks good to me! +1. Thanks.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9450) TestDistributedLogSplitting fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759728#comment-13759728 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9450: -- Yes, seems MiniHBaseCluster had a hard time t

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9450) TestDistributedLogSplitting fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759775#comment-13759775 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9450: -- [~jxiang] Seem your check in for HBASE-9438 m

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9450) TestDistributedLogSplitting fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13760400#comment-13760400 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9450: -- The patch looks good to me. +1. Thanks.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9390: - Attachment: hbase-9390-v2.patch I reverted the preWALRestore interface change part. The v2 patch

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9376) TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~/hbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9376: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 0.98.0 Hadoop Flags: Review

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9376) TestDistributedLogSplitting creates a MiniCluster rooted at ~/hbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13760605#comment-13760605 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9376: -- Thanks [~saint@gmail.com] & [~ndimiduk] f

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9338) Test Big Linked List fails on Hadoop 2.1.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762412#comment-13762412 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9338: -- [~eclark] In the SlowDeterministic mode, we h

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9360) Enable 0.94 -> 0.96 replication to minimize upgrade down time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762484#comment-13762484 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9360: -- [~jdcryans] You mentioned another valid scena

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9481: - Affects Version/s: 0.96.0 > Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationExc

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9481: Summary: Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException Key: HBASE-9481 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9481: - Description: In integration tests, we found SSH got aborted with following stack trace: {code} 13

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9481: - Attachment: hbase-9481.patch > Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModification

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9481: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModi

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762499#comment-13762499 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- The code pattern is like the following: {code

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763197#comment-13763197 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- It's not ideal to abort here. Because the abo

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763259#comment-13763259 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- Oh, my bad I thought aborting master. Abortin

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9481) Servershutdown handler get aborted with ConcurrentModificationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763271#comment-13763271 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9481: -- Thanks [~jxiang], [~saint@gmail.com] and

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763528#comment-13763528 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- Yeah. In [~devaraj] patch, he only touched on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13763658#comment-13763658 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- {quote} At least, we don't see the same probl

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764592#comment-13764592 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- {quote} If a region is indeed not served in a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764777#comment-13764777 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- I reviewed trunk-9480.patch. Since we have ou

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-9512) Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off distributeLogReplay and restart a cluster

Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-9512: Summary: Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off distributeLogReplay and restart a cluster Key: HBASE-9512 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764844#comment-13764844 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- The region isn't there could be the case that

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9512) Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off distributeLogReplay and restart a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9512: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9512) Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off distributeLogReplay and restart a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9512: - Attachment: hbase-9512.patch > Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765188#comment-13765188 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9390: -- Thanks for the reviews! If there is no object

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765246#comment-13765246 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- I reviewed the 1.2 patch. The newly introduce

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765777#comment-13765777 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- {quote} For example, inside handleRegion when

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9480) Regions are unexpectedly made offline in certain failure conditions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13767044#comment-13767044 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9480: -- [~saint@gmail.com] v2 patch looks good to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-9390) coprocessors observers are not called during a recovery with the new log replay algorithm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13767294#comment-13767294 ] Jeffrey Zhong commented on HBASE-9390: -- I've integrated the v2 patch into trunk and 0

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-9512) Regions can't get out InRecovery state sometimes when turn off distributeLogReplay and restart a cluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeffrey Zhong updated HBASE-9512: - Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 0.98.0 > Regions can't get out InRecovery state some

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >