[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16245077#comment-16245077
]
Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-139:
-
I think there're two problems here:
# when-to-sync: this is the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16245025#comment-16245025
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-95:
--
{{example/src/main/bin}} sounds since it won't confuse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16245011#comment-16245011
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-139:
The wait for the log-sync adds to the operation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze updated RATIS-135:
--
+1
> Closed segments contribute to leaked memory as eviction policies are not
> honoured
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze reassigned RATIS-137:
-
Assignee: Lokesh Jain
> RaftBasicTests.testBasicAppendEntries may fail
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244933#comment-16244933
]
Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-139:
-
[~jnp], have you seen a performance penalty with the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao reassigned RATIS-139:
---
Assignee: Jing Zhao
> RaftLogWorker should use two task queues.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze updated RATIS-129:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.2.0-alpha)
> Compile protobuf and shade if the shaded source
Jitendra Nath Pandey created RATIS-139:
--
Summary: RaftLogWorker should use two task queues.
Key: RATIS-139
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-139
Project: Ratis
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244891#comment-16244891
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-122:
+1, the latest patch looks good to me.
> Add a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244884#comment-16244884
]
Hadoop QA commented on RATIS-122:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244870#comment-16244870
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-138:
---
I just have reverted the commit in RATIS-129.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244868#comment-16244868
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze edited comment on RATIS-129 at 11/8/17 10:35 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze resolved RATIS-129.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
Resolving this as Not A Problem.
> Compile protobuf and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze reopened RATIS-129:
---
Reopen for reverting.
> Compile protobuf and shade if the shaded source directory is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244865#comment-16244865
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-138:
---
Let's just revert RATIS-129 using git. I am happy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze updated RATIS-122:
--
Attachment: r122_20171108.patch
Thanks [~jnp]. Here is a new patch addressing your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244841#comment-16244841
]
Hadoop QA commented on RATIS-138:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244770#comment-16244770
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-138:
cc [~elek], [~szetszwo]
> "mvn clean install"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244769#comment-16244769
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-129:
I have created RATIS-138, and attached a revert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey updated RATIS-138:
---
Attachment: RATIS-138.1.patch
> "mvn clean install" doesn't work.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244767#comment-16244767
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-138:
A revert of RATIS-129 fixes this problem. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Elek, Marton updated RATIS-95:
--
Attachment: RATIS-95.wip.patch
Preview version of the patch is uploaded. Stil I am thinking what is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244680#comment-16244680
]
Hadoop QA commented on RATIS-135:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244626#comment-16244626
]
Elek, Marton commented on RATIS-129:
RATIS-132 doesn't fix this problem. See the precommit message of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mukul Kumar Singh updated RATIS-135:
Attachment: RATIS-135.002.patch
patch v2 fixes the unit test failure.
> Closed segments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244522#comment-16244522
]
Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-77:
It's because if the incoming request is a stream, we expect response for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16244489#comment-16244489
]
Jing Zhao commented on RATIS-117:
-
The latest patch looks pretty good to me. Just some minors:
# Let's use
Jitendra Nath Pandey created RATIS-138:
--
Summary: "mvn clean install" doesn't work.
Key: RATIS-138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-138
Project: Ratis
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16243496#comment-16243496
]
Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on RATIS-122:
A few minor comments.
* It might be better to
30 matches
Mail list logo