[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17869060#comment-17869060
]
Yuntong Qu commented on SOLR-16479:
---
Seems like this has been fixed by Jason. repository is added in v2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17869059#comment-17869059
]
Ravi Ranjan Jha commented on SOLR-17370:
Can someone please take a look at this issue? It should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Houston Putman updated SOLR-12963:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> change default for 'uninvertible' to 'false' (dependent on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Houston Putman updated SOLR-12963:
--
Fix Version/s: 9.7
> change default for 'uninvertible' to 'false' (dependent on new schema
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated SOLR-12963:
--
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> change default for 'uninvertible' to 'false'
HoustonPutman opened a new pull request, #2601:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2601
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12963
Follow up from https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2017, make
`uninvertible=false` default starting in schema version 1.7, along with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Houston Putman resolved SOLR-10808.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.7
Assignee: Houston Putman
Resolution: Done
This has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17869028#comment-17869028
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10808:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17869024#comment-17869024
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15831:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated SOLR-10808:
--
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Enable DocValues by default for all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17869023#comment-17869023
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10808:
Commit
HoustonPutman merged PR #2017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2017
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
gerlowskija commented on PR #2598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2598#issuecomment-2253388336
As I read things the `factoryProp == null` branch is dead code on
main/branch_9x, since `randomization.gradle` sets that prop on all builds?
I think you're right that with the PR
gerlowskija opened a new pull request, #2600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2600
# Description
Although success and failures are written to stdout, `./gradlew
integrationTest` doesn't produce any lasting artifact (i.e. a report) to
indicate which tests succeeded and which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aparna Suresh updated SOLR-17381:
-
Summary: Make CLUSTERSTATUS request configurable (was: Make CLUSTERSTATUS
configurable)
> Make
Christos Malliaridis created SOLR-17384:
---
Summary: Update ExportTool's argument representation
Key: SOLR-17384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17384
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christos Malliaridis updated SOLR-17383:
Description:
With the changes from SOLR-16757 arguments were moved to java source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christos Malliaridis updated SOLR-17383:
Description:
With the changes from SOLR-16757 arguments were moved to java source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christos Malliaridis updated SOLR-17383:
Description:
With the changes from SOLR-16757 arguments were moved to java source
Christos Malliaridis created SOLR-17383:
---
Summary: Resolve overlapping arguments
Key: SOLR-17383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17383
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
Christos Malliaridis created SOLR-17382:
---
Summary: Deprecate addlopts in RunExampleTool.java
Key: SOLR-17382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17382
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christos Malliaridis updated SOLR-17382:
Description:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christos Malliaridis updated SOLR-17382:
Description:
aparnasuresh85 opened a new pull request, #2599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2599
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17381
# Description
Please provide a short description of the changes you're making with this
pull request.
Modify the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aparna Suresh updated SOLR-17381:
-
Summary: Make CLUSTERSTATUS configurable (was: Make CLUSTERSTATUS command
configurable)
> Make
Aparna Suresh created SOLR-17381:
Summary: Make CLUSTERSTATUS command configurable
Key: SOLR-17381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17381
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
gus-asf commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1693385066
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/util/ExecutorUtil.java:
##
@@ -313,6 +340,37 @@ public MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor(
RejectedExecutionHandler
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1693381153
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/util/ExecutorUtil.java:
##
@@ -313,6 +340,37 @@ public MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor(
RejectedExecutionHandler
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1693382984
##
solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/util/ExecutorUtil.java:
##
@@ -313,6 +340,37 @@ public MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor(
RejectedExecutionHandler
gus-asf commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1693382945
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -1921,9 +1921,7 @@ public ScoreMode scoreMode() {
final TopDocs topDocs;
final
gus-asf commented on PR #2585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2585#issuecomment-2253177359
Ah interesting question. Reminds me of something I said years ago. We are
quite tightly bound to ZK for our coordination needs. This might be an
opportunity to introduce an interface that
dsmiley commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1693362912
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -1921,9 +1921,7 @@ public ScoreMode scoreMode() {
final TopDocs topDocs;
final
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17868983#comment-17868983
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-17379:
-
Approving your patch (I did read it) and wanted to thank you
dsmiley commented on PR #2598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2598#issuecomment-2253137155
Since the issue I refer to is "initCore()"; it's old tests that extend
STCJ4, most new ones don't (or shouldn't) use initCore().
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
dsmiley commented on PR #2598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2598#issuecomment-2253134832
I did a search for RAMDirectoryFactory in source code to look for other
possible issues, and I see what may be a bigger challenge in
`org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4#initCore()`.
```
gerlowskija commented on PR #2598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2598#issuecomment-2253123796
See [this dev list
thread](https://lists.apache.org/thread/hz6ovvj611c91wwk6y0123zoff4c2v0w) for
more context
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
gerlowskija opened a new pull request, #2598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2598
# Description
IDE's like IntelliJ and Eclipse have internal test-runners that can often
run tests faster than using the project's gradle build. But many tests cannot
use these IDE-internal
dsmiley commented on PR #2585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2585#issuecomment-2253046055
Because ZkStateReader has no getter for CollectionPropertiesZkStateReader,
in fact callers must continue to use ZkStateReader. There isn't anything
necessarily wrong with that but then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17868970#comment-17868970
]
Christos Malliaridis edited comment on SOLR-16824 at 7/26/24 3:48 PM:
cpoerschke commented on PR #2489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2489#issuecomment-2253034480
> @cpoerschke see the parent JIRA issue for the real state of this
controvertial PR
Thanks for the pointer! It inspired me to do some #2597 scribbling.
--
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17868970#comment-17868970
]
Christos Malliaridis commented on SOLR-16824:
-
Notes while working on this issue (moved from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17868968#comment-17868968
]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-17319:
I wonder if having a new component (idea already
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2597#discussion_r1693267640
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/CompoundQueryComponent.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2597#discussion_r1693265231
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/CompoundSearchHandler.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
cpoerschke opened a new pull request, #2597:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2597
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17319
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated SOLR-17319:
--
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Introduce support for Reciprocal Rank Fusion
gus-asf commented on PR #2585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2585#issuecomment-2252994980
The concept looks good not able to fully detail review the whole thing so
I'll give it a +0. If it does successfully achieve a "pure" refactor, shrinking
a 2500 line class is clearly good.
aparnasuresh85 commented on code in PR #2585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2585#discussion_r1693097222
##
solr/solrj-zookeeper/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/cloud/CollectionPropertiesZkStateReader.java:
##
@@ -50,17 +50,14 @@ public class
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1692996096
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -1921,9 +1921,7 @@ public ScoreMode scoreMode() {
final TopDocs topDocs;
final
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2596#discussion_r1692994607
##
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -1921,8 +1921,11 @@ public ScoreMode scoreMode() {
final TopDocs topDocs;
gus-asf commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1692984958
##
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestCpuAllowedLimit.java:
##
@@ -61,7 +65,12 @@ private static Path createConfigSet() throws Exception {
}
gus-asf commented on PR #2596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2596#issuecomment-2252596335
I'm not sure about the conversion to Boolean and only reporting if it was
requested. That will still leave the default decision unclear if it wasn't
requested explicitly. I think the
cpoerschke commented on PR #2590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2590#issuecomment-2252553445
> ... they were cryptic I updated them in #2595 ...
I wonder if log level diagnostics might be enough, perhaps the diagnostic
could be debug generally and info when the
gus-asf commented on PR #2590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2590#issuecomment-2252526869
> [First started failing April
cpoerschke commented on PR #2596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2596#issuecomment-2252528119
https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/10110021801/job/27959091476?pr=2596
CI failure looks unrelated
```
./gradlew :solr:core:test --tests
cpoerschke commented on code in PR #2595:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2595#discussion_r1692900328
##
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestCpuAllowedLimit.java:
##
@@ -61,7 +65,12 @@ private static Path createConfigSet() throws Exception {
}
cpoerschke closed pull request #2590: SOLR-13350, SOLR-17298: multi-threaded
search: don't (yet) support query limits
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2590
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
cpoerschke commented on PR #2590:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2590#issuecomment-2252514022
closing in favour of #2595 adding support for query limits;
separately #2596 to add documentation and `responseHeader.multiThreadedUsed`
diagnostics;
--
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-17337:
---
Fix Version/s: 9.7
> Display all custom distributed stages in debug output
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christine Poerschke reassigned SOLR-17337:
--
Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Display all custom distributed stages in
cpoerschke opened a new pull request, #2596:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2596
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
61 matches
Mail list logo
