OTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:14 AM
> To: Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
>
>
> I have no doubts that it can be optimized but I don't have
> the time to look
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 17:33
Subject: RE: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
> > iText does it the correct way. The curves you see are to make
> > the round end caps.
>
> FOP actually does it the correct way, too. I'm sorry,
Sorry, I forgot the attachments...
-Thomas
If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the
delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may
contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case,
if
not, why not?
I'll dig around in the source code some more...
Best Regards,
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulo Soares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:35 AM
> To: Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
homas - CannonSA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Paulo Soares'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:08
Subject: RE: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
> Ok, I figured out how to make FOP generate uncom
Ok, I figured out how to make FOP generate uncompressed
PDF and compared the output FOP and iText generate for
a very simple SVG element.
SVG:
FOP (noise removed):
10 10 m
100 10 l
S
iText (noise removed):
10 89.75 m
100 89.75 l
100.14 89.75 100.25 89.86 100.25 90 c
100.25 90.14 100.14 90.25 1
> FOP: batik->fop->pdf
> iText: batik->Graphics2D->iText->pdf
I think FOP does it the same way as iText:
Batik->Graphics2D->FOP->PDF
Take a look at org.apache.fop.svg.PDFGraphics2D.
It seems to be doing exactly the same as
com.lowagie.text.pdf.PdfGraphics2D.
> > > That's because with fop fo
Thanks, I'll take a look.
-Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulo Soares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:03 PM
> To: Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
>
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 17:26
Subject: RE: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
> Paolo,
>
> that's exactly what I'm looking for. Currently, we're doing
> Batik->PDFGraphics2D->FOP->PDF, but it is pretty slow. I
> Paolo,
Sorry, that should have read "Paulo".
-Thomas
If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for
the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this
message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In
m: Paulo Soares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 8:52 AM
> To: Leonard Rosenthol; Phillip Rhodes;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
>
>
> Just a side note about SVG. I obtained good results with
>
At 4:52 PM +0100 8/16/02, Paulo Soares wrote:
>Just a side note about SVG. I obtained good results with batik writing to
>a PdfGraphics2D.
That's cute - Batik->PdfGraphics2D->iText->PDF. NICE!
Leonard
--
---
Leona
- Original Message -
From: "Leonard Rosenthol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phillip Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 14:16
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] difference between itext and fop?
> At 9:32 PM -0400
At 9:32 PM -0400 8/15/02, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>Given a valid xml document, Can someone tell me why I may want to
>use itext rather than fop?
>
In general it's probably a toss up. Some things to consider.
1) FOP requires that you use the complex (but standard) XSL:FO
grammar - so tha
14 matches
Mail list logo
