Yes.
But, for non-labeled toggles, extra gap can be eliminated via setting
explicit rastersize.
In any case, it already fixed by You.
6/18/2015 1:41, Antonio Scuri пишет:
No. The checkbox of the toggle has a fixed size in all native systems. I
don't recall seeing a way to change that
Hi,
No nightlies, sorry.
We should release a bug fix in the next couple of weeks.
Best,
Scuri
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Mihail Ivanchev mihai...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick fix, Antonio. Are there nightlies available
somewhere or I have to build the trunk myself (not a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Resending my previous email since it exceeded the size limit for the
list. I will include the attachments in the following emails.
Hi
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Resending my previous email since it exceeded the size
Hi,
I didn't check all your calculations, but did you noticed that when the
dialog is resize you do the FitMat* twice? When MatA is resized, you
compute both, then MatC is also resized and you compute both again.
I think it would more interesting to set the size only of the respective
I think the problem may be occurring because of the following which I don't
understand:
I have a iuptabs control that starts off with a size of 776x361 clientsize
(which is the same as either matrix rastersize.) I have 2 matrix controls
in the 2 tabs and I resize its rows and columns as follows:
