[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858157#action_12858157
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2393:
Patch looks good Tom -- th
terms.docFreq()));
>
> Tom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:50 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in contrib/misc/HighFreqTerms.java?
>
> OK I committed th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857914#action_12857914
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2398:
This is a great cleanup Ro
ts that do
> this ...
>
> Dev on the experimental latest greatest fun branch, or the more in the past,
> back compat hassle stable branch? Port most patches to two somewhat
> diverging code bases?
>
> If that was actually how things worked out, I'd be +1. I just wonder ...
Getting back to the stable/experimental branches...
I think, with separate stable & experimental branches, development
would/should be active on both branches. It'd depend on the
feature...
Eg today we'd have 3.x stable branch and the experimental branch
(= trunk).
Small features, bug fixes, wo
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> for now simply moving analyzers to its own jar filE would be a great step!
+1 -- why not consolidate all analyzers now? (And fix indexer to
require a minimal API = TokenStream minus reset & close).
Mike
-
Unfortunately, live searching against an old index can get very hairy.
EG look at what I had to do for the "flex API on pre-flex index" flex
emulation layer.
It's also not great because it gives the illusion that all is good,
yet, you've taken a silent hit (up to ~10% or so) in your search
perf.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857381#action_12857381
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
{quote}
i would love to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857373#action_12857373
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
bq. The usual design is a qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1278.
Resolution: Won't Fix
I think the pulsing codec (wraps any other codec
2010/4/15 Shai Erera :
> One way is to define 'major' as X and minor X.Y, and another is to define
> major as 'X.Y' and minor as 'X.Y.Z'. I prefer the latter but don't have any
> strong feelings against the former.
I prefer X.Y, ie, changes to Y only is a minor release (mostly bug
fixes but may
Yah :)
TestStressIndexing2 is another slow one... I'll go fix it...
Mike
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> See you already did that Mike :). Thanks ! now the tests run for 2s.
>
> Shai
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrot
Presumably you'd also hit this exception if the DP deletes all commit
points, right?
I like IllegalStateException.
Mike
2010/4/15 Shai Erera :
> BTW, even if it's a stupid thing to do, someone can today create SDP and
> call snapshot without ever creating IW. And it's not an impossible scenario.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857124#action_12857124
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
This is awesome Michael!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857121#action_12857121
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2393:
Programmatically indexing t
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Essentially, we're free to break back compat within "Lucy" at any time, but
> we're not able to break back compat within a stable fork like "Lucy1",
> "Lucy2", etc. So what we'll probably do during normal development with
> Analyzers is
72] 536480
body:[55 6e 69 74 65 64] 543746
Which is not very readable, but, it does this because flex terms are
arbitrary byte[], not necessarily utf8... maybe we should fix it to
print both hex and String if we assume bytes are utf8?
Mike
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Michael McCandless
Ugh, I'll fix this.
With the new flex API, you can't ask a composite (Multi/DirReader) for
its postings -- you have to go through the static methods on
MultiFields. I'm trying to put some distance b/w IndexReader and
composite readers... because I'd like to eventually deprecate them.
Ie, the comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2387:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2387-29x.patch
29x version of this patch.
> IndexWriter reta
Flex has already landed (in trunk, for 3.1), so this is "just" a
matter of someone creating a codec using Group VarInt.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:58 AM, John Wang wrote:
> This would be something that's excellent for contribution after the
> Flex-Indexing support is added.
> -John
>
> On We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856479#action_12856479
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2371:
Reminder to future self:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2111.
Resolution: Fixed
> Wrapup flexible index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856357#action_12856357
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Patch looks good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856065#action_12856065
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Yeah I think new IW(),
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856022#action_12856022
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Shai, can you also test CR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855916#action_12855916
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2316:
bq. I'm also ok w/ the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855906#action_12855906
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2392:
bq. I think what I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855905#action_12855905
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2392:
bq. Mike, I don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855786#action_12855786
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Patch looks good... thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2392:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2392.patch
Rough first patch attached
> Enable flexi
Enable flexible scoring
---
Key: LUCENE-2392
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Reporter: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855750#action_12855750
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Shai I think you should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855747#action_12855747
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Actually I consider this a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855738#action_12855738
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
I like the fix (catching
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855736#action_12855736
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2316:
I don't think Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855548#action_12855548
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2376:
Yes total unique fields are
t;
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>>
>> I agree IW should not hold refs to the Field instances from the last
>> doc indexed... I put a patch on LUCENE-2387 to null the reference as
>> we go. Can you confirm this lets GC reclaim?
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855492#action_12855492
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2372:
+1 to making KeywordAnal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855470#action_12855470
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
I think oal.index is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855421#action_12855421
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
Patch looks good!
Hmm... m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2387.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> IndexWriter retains references
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855364#action_12855364
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
How about we subclass FNFE?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855347#action_12855347
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2387:
I agree, Uwe -- I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855343#action_12855343
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2364:
Maybe we should simply depre
I agree IW should not hold refs to the Field instances from the last
doc indexed... I put a patch on LUCENE-2387 to null the reference as
we go. Can you confirm this lets GC reclaim?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Ruben Laguna wrote:
> But the Readers I'm talking about are not held by th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2387:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2387.patch
Attached patch nulls out the Fieldable reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2387:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> IndexWriter retains references to Readers u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855336#action_12855336
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2376:
Hmm indeed you have a great
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855333#action_12855333
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
bq. This is a behaviora
It's also slow because it repeats all the tests for each of the core
codecs (standard, sep, pulsing, intblock).
I think it's fine to reduce the number of iterations -- just make sure
there's no seed to newRandom() so the distributing testing is
"effective".
Mike
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM,
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>> But, IW doesn't let you "hold on to" checkpoints... only to commits.
>>
>> Ie SnapshotDP will only "see" actual commit/close calls, not
>> intermediate checkpoints like a random segment merge completing, a
>> flush happening, etc.
>>
>> Or.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855215#action_12855215
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
I think the patch is good
Actually Toke opened a new issue (LUCENE-2369) for the new approach to
Locale-based sorting... I think we should leave the existing issue as
the single-segment optimization (it's a separate issue).
Mike
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > Is it possible to change it? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855135#action_12855135
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2386:
I agree: IW really should
+1
I don't think bw needs to be kept -- contrib/benchmark is allowed to change.
Mike
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've noticed benchmark has a NoDeletionPolicy class and I was wondering if
> we can move it to core. I might want to use it for the parallel index stuf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854876#action_12854876
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2376:
OK but I suspect the root c
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>> No, this doesn't make sense. The OS detects a disk full on accepting
>> the write into the write cache, not [later] on flushing the write
>> cache to disk. If the OS accepts the write, then disk is not full (ie
>> flushing the cache will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854717#action_12854717
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2364:
Once we fix Term to ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2383.
Resolution: Fixed
> Some small fixes after the flex me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854684#action_12854684
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2383:
Thanks Uwe, I agree th
Yes +1 to that -- thanks Uwe!!
And thanks for the many other people who helped out on flex. It's a
big and exciting improvement :)
Mike
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> Uwe, thanks for doing all the svn work! Was a smooth transition!
>
> Michael
>
> On 4/6/10 12:27 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2383:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2383.patch
> Some small fixes after the flex me
Some small fixes after the flex merge...
Key: LUCENE-2383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2383
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854615#action_12854615
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2380:
We could also do shared
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854612#action_12854612
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1536:
With flex, you can now get
Components: Index
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
This is a regression (we lost functionality on landing flex).
When you close IW with "false" (meaning abort all running merges), IW asks the
merge threads to abort. T
- Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
We wastefully use a whole int today, but for enumerated fields (eg "country",
"state", "color", "category") this is very wasteful since you could use
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
With flex, a term is now an opaque byte[] (typically, utf8 encoded unicode
string, but not necessarily), so we need to push this up the search stack.
FieldCache now has getStrings and getStringIndex; we need corresponding methods
to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2379.
Resolution: Duplicate
Woops -- dup of LUCENE-2364.
> TermRangeQu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854575#action_12854575
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2364:
Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 3.1
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
With flex, a term is a byte[] (BytesRef) not a String... we need to push this
"up the search stack".
TermRangeQuery / FieldCacheRangeFilter.newStringRa
Cutover remaining usage of pre-flex APIs
Key: LUCENE-2378
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2378
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854409#action_12854409
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2373:
I would love to make Lu
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>> Running out of disk space with fsync disabled won't lead to corruption.
>> Even kill -9 the JRE process with fsync disabled won't corrupt.
>> In these cases index just falls back to last successful commit.
>>
>> It's "only" power loss / OS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854401#action_12854401
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2377:
Patch looks good Shai!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854398#action_12854398
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2376:
Is this the same issue as LU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1990.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Flex Branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854174#action_12854174
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990:
OK indeed now I can see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1976.
Resolution: Fixed
OK fixed on 3.1.
> isCurrent() and getVersion() on an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2329.
Resolution: Fixed
Third time's a charm?
> Use parallel arrays in
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> So, I want to pump my IndexWriter hard and fast with documents.
Nice.
> Removing fsync from FSDirectory helps. But for that I pay with possibility of
> index corruption, not only if my node suddenly loses
> power/kernelpanics, but also i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854120#action_12854120
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2361:
Hmm but the above infoSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1976:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> isCurrent() and getVersion() on an NRT reader are bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-1976:
Reopening to fix on 3.1 after flex lands...
> isCurrent() and getVersion() on an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854112#action_12854112
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2370:
The bug is LUCENE-1976 -- a
Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Website
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Fix For: 3.1
The standard codec changes how the terms index is written (eg uses packed ints,
writes a whole field's terms at once, etc.)... we h
have to be ordered if we
> introduce updates? Or does the onus of maintaining order fall on the
> application?
>
> -Babak
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Babak Farhang wrote:
>>>> I think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2329:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2329.patch
New patch, init'ing the postings arrays in THPF.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2265:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2265.patch
bq. The problem is it does not handle at least the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853815#action_12853815
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2329:
bq. We could move th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853811#action_12853811
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2361:
Hmm are you sure you'r
The flex API isolates fields, ie you get a TermsEnum for a given field
and it enums only the term's text (as a BytesRef).
Mike
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> A random thought from some of the earlier discussions.
>
> Had anybody used the fact that Lucene Term space is c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2265:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2265.patch
Patch w/ first cut at method to cutover whole UTF32
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2265:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2265.patch
Attached patch for first cut at APIs to convert a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2365.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.1)
3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2329:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2329.patch
> Use parallel arrays instead of PostingList obje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-2329:
Reopening -- this fixed causes an intermittent deadlock in
TestStressIndexing2.
It&#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853497#action_12853497
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2365:
Thanks, patch looks good;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2365:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Finding Newest Segment In Empty In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853273#action_12853273
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2354:
Patch looks good Uwe!
>
1 - 100 of 6433 matches
Mail list logo
