On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Chris Male wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Its a direction that is still under heavy development but its definitely
> the direction I would like it go.
>
> I think once the code merge happens, I can easily brin
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Chris Male wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Its a direction that is still under heavy development but its definitely the
> direction I would like it go.
I think once the code merge happens, I can easily bring in the updates I made
too. For instance, I've added a fair numbe
Hi Alex,
Its a direction that is still under heavy development but its definitely the
direction I would like it go.
Cheers
Chris
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks once again for all your support and contributions.
>
> I figured out there was a new TestSpatialF
Hi Chris,
Thanks once again for all your support and contributions.
I figured out there was a new TestSpatialFilter.java file.
I think this is the new way to do things using spatial.
Am I right?
Thanks
Hi Alex,
The patches in 2139 have not been updated to trunk so if you are applying
them to a checkout, you may get errors.
Also, to make it easier for review, I broke the 2139 patch up into smaller
patches, attached at the issues 2139 depends on. I would look into applying
those patches instead
Hi all,
I'm back to working and evaluating the spatial contrib and I see a lot has
changed in past few months.
I see there has been a couple of patches that were submitted.
I just applied LUCENE-2139.patch and am trying to work with it right now.
I think I am missing something as I see DistanceQ
