Hi,
> 1) It might be OK to implement retrieving field values separately for a
> document. However, I think from a simplicity point of view, it might be
> better to have the application code do this drudgery. Adding this feature
> could complicate the nice and simple design of Lucene without much
Dear All,
I have some thoughts on this issue as well.
1) It might be OK to implement retrieving field values separately for a
document. However, I think from a simplicity point of view, it might be
better to have the application code do this drudgery. Adding this feature
could complicate the nice
Hi,
a discussion in
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-196
might be of interest to you.
Did you think about storing the large pieces of documents
in a database to reduce the size of Lucene index?
I think there are good reasons to adding support for
storing fields in separate files:
1
Hi all,
in our testing application using lucene 1.4.3. Thanks you guys for
that great job.
We have index file around 12GiB, one file (merged). To retrieve hits it
takes nice small amount of the time, but reading fields takes 10-100
times more (the stored ones). I think because all the fields
