Re: Possibility of introducing non-Apache license DTDDoc into build system?

2007-10-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Its would be more convenient to build the docs automatically on the servers : rather than upload generated copies manually but I can see that may not be : possible. : I guess I'm happy to maintain the generated docs manually and add an ant task : for anyone else who has DTDdoc installed locally

Re: Possibility of introducing non-Apache license DTDDoc into build system?

2007-10-03 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Anyone know what the procedure/licensing implications are if I wanted to add a : build dependency on DTDDoc? It looks like historically the Struts project used : DTDDoc for some of their documentation but that was using Maven 2 and it looks : to me like DTDDoc is not entirely Apache licensed

Re: Possibility of introducing non-Apache license DTDDoc into build system?

2007-10-03 Thread markharw00d
it's just a tool for generating HTML docs from the DTD right? Yep. the generated HTML docs could be commited to the repository Its would be more convenient to build the docs automatically on the servers rather than upload generated copies manually but I can see that may not be possible. I

Possibility of introducing non-Apache license DTDDoc into build system?

2007-10-02 Thread markharw00d
I've put together DTDs documenting the full XML query syntax and used comments/examples that a DTDDoc ant task can turn into useful hyperlinked HTML help documents. Anyone know what the procedure/licensing implications are if I wanted to add a build dependency on DTDDoc? It looks like

Re: Possibility of introducing non-Apache license DTDDoc into build system?

2007-10-02 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Is it something you can model after GData and the DB stuff, whereby it downloads the necessary dependencies as part of the build? Otherwise, I would ask on legal-discuss On Oct 2, 2007, at 6:18 PM, markharw00d wrote: I've put together DTDs documenting the full XML query syntax and used