contrib/analyzers is already it's own jar, or am I missing something?
On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
With the added analyzer for LUCENE-1629, it seems the jar file is
now ~3.5MB.
Given the size, does it make sense to put it in its own jar file?
That way programs can easily
gt; Subject: Re: 3MB lucene-analyzers.jar?
>
> contrib/analyzers is already it's own jar, or am I missing something?
>
> On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>
> > With the added analyzer for LUCENE-1629, it seems the jar file is
> > now ~3.5MB.
> >
t; H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 2:32 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject:
: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:15 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3MB lucene-analyzers.jar?
>
> What if we just build two jars? I guess it would make sense to keep it
> in this contrib module.
> I would do the changes to build.xml.
>
> simon
>
> On Sun,
hi.de
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:15 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 3MB lucene-analyzers.jar?
>>
>> What if we just build two jars? I guess it
>> But: I do not understand the problems with this JAR file. If somebody really
>> wants to have smaller files, one could use some tools, that do it
>> automatically on class usage.
> I personally have a couple of usecases for that as I have to work in
> very limited environments. Imagine embedded
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>>> But: I do not understand the problems with this JAR file. If somebody really
>>> wants to have smaller files, one could use some tools, that do it
>>> automatically on class usage.
>> I personally have a couple of usecases for that as I ha
gt; To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3MB lucene-analyzers.jar?
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> >>> But: I do not understand the problems with this JAR file. If somebody
> really
> >>> wants to have sma
63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:37 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 3MB
ler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:37 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3MB lucene-analyzers.jar?
On Sun, J
10 matches
Mail list logo
